So this is the great paradigm.

sciencey?

We investigate claims of the paranormal, pseudo science, fringe groups and cults, and claims of all kinds between, science and pseudo science and non science and junk science, voodoo science, pathological science, bad science, non science, and plain old non sense.

Now, are we done? Have we written what we have here in scientific notation?

let's remember what it means to be in scientific notation.

Something Something scientific, right. What?

Well, then I got to thinking

Wow, wow!

But this is not quite official scientific notation.

Nye Now, um, space walks, launching Japanese modules, making scientific discoveries, that's routine.

This isn't very scientific.

You know, scientists and science is not creative.

And this is, obviously, not less than 10.

Observation is a passive science, experimentation an active science.

Why do apples fall down?

And the goal of the program is to

Well, from the standpoint of science...

That's the humanitarian mission.

Here's a redletter date in the history of science.

What?

Paradigm

From a strictly scientific point of view, history cannot be called a science.

It also shaped Darwin's scientific method, as well as that used by his peers.

Analyze and plot scientific data

A structured wysiwyg scientific text editor

And we still have this 4.01534 times 10 to the negative 8.

That's what gets us to that eight.

So that's the personal reason.

(Applause)

That scholar made a great scientific discovery.

Physics is a fundamental natural science.

Physics is a fundamental natural science.

His methods are not scientific.

The weather is forecast scientifically.

But after that,

And I remember there sitting at my desk thinking,

Girls hate bugs, love hugs, and are better at vacuuming rugs.

Well, there's no science to suggest.

In both cases you're given data, but in 1 case you have labeled data, in another you have unlabeled data.

Here's how it went.

But the trouble with the philosophers is that they were philosophizing when they should have been science ophizing.

This is basically scientific data that you're looking at.

The Vulcan Science Academy was just as skeptical about time travel.

Is that scientifically proven?

Has that been scientifically proven?