Got it right.

We have one plus nine plus eight.

and I was answered.

You could try all of these out.

Until you give me the answer.

His answer is to the point.

And you evaluate that from 0 to 1.

And that's why it's 360 8.

Right? Because 1 2 3, right?

Can I have my results?

From k is equal to 0, to n of a to the k.

I'm going to give you another presentation on why this works.

And how much do the payers actually pay?

They actually started asking, some serious solid numbers.

By the way, the number of answers you get equals the number of people you ask.

What motivates the pollinators?

I feel satisfied with that answer.

Because it's e to an infinitely positive exponent.

If you have faith, it's answered.

So the second answer on your graphing calculator is the

What do you think would happen if we run sum_list like this, passing in the empty list?

likely as if Mary calls, and if both called, it's really likely.

You're not willing to do what it takes to get the answers.

And if you make no errors, you'll get the right answer.

And that is why it was 9 out of 320 plus 1 out of 10.

I know there's a lot of fractions here, but if you just work through this, the fractions actually work out.

And all of this white space in the middle will be dropped.

Add to the imaginary parts you have 5 i minus 6 i. You get negative i

And the answer is 2.12 in approximation. The way we get this is applying this formula here 2 5 2.

He won an immediate response.

Your answer is not to the point.

And then minus 56 minus 10, so minus 66.

Or you could say, point two eight goes into twenty three point eight two eight, eighty five point one times.

And you press 7 and click on log, it'll give you this number.

For this example, it will require about 130 or so robot steps.

But at the end when you simplify it, you'll get the exact same answer.

Is that what we got?

And now we've just derived a formula for what that sum ends up being.

So there's 4 possible outcomes for problem number 1, times the 3 possible outcomes for problem number 2, and that's also where you get a 12.

Now the list and the element indices are the same.

Why has that changed 2 and has not changed 1?

So f of 0 is undefined.

So next time you see a statement like most people think they are smarter than the average person, will you say, This is impossible or will you say, This is indeed possible.

Remember, we can only do optimizations that don't change the meaning of the program.

And then if you could write it like this, and you take the derivative of both sides sorry, you take the antiderivative of both sides and you would get psi of x, y is equal to c as a solution.