The second actor, different cast of guys, is the donors.

Now we're on the upswing.

But essentially what happened is the investors in the mortgage backed securities provided the money to the special purpose entity to essentially loan to the borrowers.

So that's a way to get basic services scaled up.

We've already received a record number of financial pledges tonight, Beth.

They provide wholesale and warehousing.

This is the retiree health care benefits.

Could he finance Thé's army?

But they never do.

Who will provide capital for the venture?

(Laughter)

At the time they were mostly losing money.

Show their logo on the invite, a poster, your website or your program booklet.

And so you're bound to make your new drug look better.

Over the next few years big decisions will be made in Washington on jobs, the economy, taxes and deficits, energy, education, war and peace.

In the general election, it's the citizens who get to vote, if you're over 18, in some states if you have an ID.

Take GeoMapping.

There's a proposal to actually put together an institute.

Payroll?

So we still have the same amount of debt.

This is the angel investor, and this is all of us down here, and all of this is equity.

Well, surprisingly of course venture capital always does follow on rounds so this was kind of a trick question.

And I took those photographs, and I went to the HRC and I asked them for some help.

But you must do extremely well.

Kind of, sort of is people have been nice to you.

That assets, A for assets, is equal to

And so when the Federal Reserve or any Central Bank prints money, and it buys debt, it goes out into debt markets and it buys it, it usually buys the safest kind of debt, but that affects all of the debt markets, it goes out and buys in the debt market, they're essentially shifting the supply curve of money to the right, they shift the supply curve to the right.

The bank is going to be able to fulfill its promise.

So here too we have a democracy, a democracy dependent upon the funders and dependent upon the people, competing dependencies, possibly conflicting dependencies depending upon who the funders are.

Wyatt Korff and Roy Caldwell, who worked closely with me on this.

But this I just want to show you some data here.

So, I decided that I wanted to investigate the economics of terrorism.

No more than I already gave you.

Secretary General.

We have a general election, but only after the funders have had their way with the candidates who wish to run in that general election.

It should start to make a little bit of intuitive sense

So I'm just a lawyer, I look at this range of numbers, and I say it's fair for me to say it's .05 percent who are our relevant funders in America.

And number two, obviously, this dependence upon the funders produces a subtle, understated, camouflaged bending to keep the funders happy.

And then third, from what I've heard from the entrepreneurs I've gotten to know, when all else is equal, given the option to have just money to do what you need to do, or money plus the support and encouragement of a global community, people choose the community plus the money.

How to integrate your sponsors?

You're still solvent.

They serviced the loans.

And to stop it crashing over the last two to three decades, we've expanded the money supply, expanded credit and debt, so that people can keep buying stuff.

lying about my balance sheet, then I actually am good for the money.

Or the other way to view it is, assets minus liabilities is equal to equity, right?