I've been doing a lot of thinking, and the thing is, I love you.

We think it probably accounts for a lot of the north south health divide within Britain,

Tom and Bill arrived at the conclusion independently of each other.

I have thought it through, Marshall, and it's my call. Pay her.

Of course I think about him Tom.

You should consider the problem before coming to a decision.

Do you have a point?

And numbers in between give you the gray levels of uncertainty.

So what does all this mean?

But I would say that honestly we don't know.

I sure as hell am looking for any reason not to. I mean, any good reason at all.

I've been thinking about marriage a lot, and I think we should just do it.

Now, I tell them, a paper has four different sections an introduction, a methods, a results, a discussion.

You never think about getting married?

I'm not good at thinking logically.

All right, now what do they want us to come to a conclusion?

But, what it all comes down to is this.

Let's look at this logically, OK?

Why don't we take some time to think about it? You know, don't rush into anything.

We should've been done already.

Not yet, but she might marry the next one.

The way I describe this best, I've found, is to say that we're all used to two by four construction when we think about wood.

It's just a matter of the consequences.

And then on the millionth showing, they would all reach the conclusion that they all have blue foreheads, and they would leave the room.

Care to share?

Did you come up with that all by yourself?

Whereas this half had spent the whole semester coming up with grandiose theories, and at the end of semester had nothing more to show for it than some fancy theories and a mediocre pot.

Here's my suggestion

Because a valid conclusion so once again, here they're giving us a statement and they want us to come to some conclusion.

It all adds up.

And I think some dispassionate, quantitative reasoning could really bring a great deal to the debate.

Please think it over and let me know your decision.

Freedom of speech is taken as a matter of course.

We need to consider our actions and what the consequences will be.

Did you consider the consequences?

Would you think about marrying me?

It seems to me that our discussion reflects the opposite, that a better way to mutual respect is to engage directly with the moral convictions citizens bring to public life, rather than to require that people leave their deepest moral convictions outside politics before they enter.

The idea underlies his theory.

The purpose of a conclusion is to sum up the main points of the essay.

The thesis is finished except for the conclusion.

If there had been rational technology assessment then,

The discussion came to a conclusion.

And then in August, just to kind of complete the idea that we are definitely in a revolutionary period.

Turn to somebody next to you.

The more frequently your sample, the more unlikely each individual outcome is.