And finally this is really the worst thing arguments don't seem to get us anywhere they're dead ends.

Let's not argue for the sake of arguing.

listen to at least three radio stations a day.

It's hardly an act of logic.

I move that we continue the discussion.

And the tools are highly inaudible so unlike that, that statement that was done before.

For the sake of argument, let's say that

You're such a debater, M. Pierre.

Define controversial.

I had him in that discussion.

But the same goes for renewables as well.

His argument is more radical than yours.

So we have these models argument as war, argument as proof and argument as performance.

(Applause)

Can't we take a ride without having an argument?

I've heard that argument before.

Another shape is made for cancer.

To push public opinion to rally for you to stay, didn't you?

You're not just going to be accountable out of the goodness of your heart.

Can you imagine yourself watching yourself argue,

She argues for the sake of arguing.

She argues just for the sake of arguing.

Aristotle's theory of justice, and then have a discussion here to see whether Aristotle's ideas actually inform the way we think and argue about questions today.

Well, there are some other puzzles.

We carried on the discussion till late at night.

How does it apply over here? And you answer my question.

We'll talk about a learning algorithm

Because I have nothing to hide.

The matter is not open for debate.

Discuss.

In a sense, I am turning around the argument made by David Riesman in The Lonely Crowd.

He wins his arguments by logical reasoning.

These are called model selection problems.

I'll return to the drawing board, literally, in the next video and we can proceed with our discussion of inflation and deflation.

She argues just for the sake of arguing.

But there's a third model to keep in mind that I think is going to be very helpful, and that is arguments as performances, arguments in front of an audience.

The debate went back and forth, and on into the night.

His argument is rational.

This magenta distance minus this light blue distance.

They argued outside the Pig 'n Whistle.

They got along famously until the very end of the meal, and then they got into a furious argument.

I mean, who can debate instead of just argue.

I used to wonder why I did that.

Discussion of licensing issues

Discussing look'n'feel issues