The Asch conformity experiment has been repeated many times. It's been suggested that first, the distortion happens at the level of action.

You know, a lot of people risk their lives in a brief act of heroism, which is kind of cool, but Jill has what I call slow heroism.

They're illegal, matey.

Time for each other.

He who prompted the deed is angered by the deed?

This is suicide!

Did you notice anything strange before she made the attempt?

I call the rape of the natural world.

After the cold war they had to invent enemies that you couldn't even kill.

And if they said yes, we gave them the one that they built and we broke.

I was basically concerned about what was going on in the world.

Sure is. Fools' names and fools' faces.

That's just a cheap publicity stunt.

You are acting beyond your position.

You are abusing your authority.

Broken fixtures, missing tools.

This should be an And sign, not an A.

Doesn't he repeat the exercise?

You suicidal son of a bitch.

His every victory is an act of defiance.

We look at all the actions from that state, and we add to the path the actions and the result of that state so we get a new path that has the old path, the action and the result of that action, and we stick all of those paths back onto the frontier.

This is called an action schema.

Fastening is going to consume one nut and one bolt.

He committed an illegal act.

It is an act of folly.

If you're unmarried, that number drops to three.

Narrator The next question is challenging.

Notice that these three actions have no slack between them.

Suicide is a desperate act.

Actions speak louder than words.

Let's face it

That's what engagement is. It's different from compliance.

Spanish chef accused ... and the French accused him.

SOPA stands for the Stop Online Piracy Act.

(Laughter)

And I kept thinking about this 70 percent.

For situation calculus it turns out to be easier to do it the other way around.

Many atrocities were committed during the war.

The state field indicates the state at the end of the path.

So here's one example of a successor state axiom.

We were surprised at his conduct.

I will go to buy the meat for the stew.

What vile behavior!

It is nothing less than an invasion.

Now, in this version, there are no sensors and so no percepts.