Subject?

Test Subject 19.

Dan Dennett See the shadows going back and forth? Pretty big.

And then we should have random assignments to conditions.

How does this work?

'Uh, one'....'one'.... 'one'. .......the volunteer answers, 'It's two'...... 'one'

'Three.....'three'.....three.... the volunteer answers 'three'.....'three'

I have to show you something from my own lab, so let me sneak this in.

Let me show you how we do that.

And it was really enjoyable, really interesting.

Nothing we can use to id.

Shh, shh.

It turns out that this score is actually meaningful.

That is, of course, sex. Great sex.

Submerge the subject in water.

Show the next picture for 240 milliseconds. Blank.

This was recently done with a neuroscientific twist.

It's okay. It's just me.

So Claire and Emily were treating themselves.

Test subject 19 was your wife?

So far, all the test subjects

The subjects for the experiment were chosen at random.

And, it's N by P.

What we did was we took images, such as shown here in the left column.

What happens? Watch as happiness is synthesized.

So they learned quickly and efficiently.

Have you seen your share of traumatized warriors?

This test subject is in a highly suggestible state,

And we studied whether and how their emotional experiences changed as they grew older.

The subjects for the experiment were chosen at random.

The people for the experiment were chosen at random.

Okay, back to the example.

And there's three variables. So those are the, the.

And in effect, what we have is some sort of stick in one hand attached to a robot, and they're going to move that back and forward.

So along with colleagues in Zurich, we put 200 men on oxytocin or placebo, had that same trust test with money, and we found that those on oxytocin not only showed more trust, we can more than double the number of people who sent all their money to a stranger all without altering mood or cognition.

This is the 1950s.

I did not screen my subjects properly.

I want to be the first one to try it out.

There was a girl. She was from the same experiment.

Roy mccomb was one of your test subjects.

I see the change.

And once they got proficient on 3 back, it would go to 4 back. And so on and so on and so on and that's the working memory training.

So this is one of our experiments.

One study by Coricelli and Nagel gives a really sharp, interesting answer.

So I'm going to show you now one of the patients from this trial.