So that means that this path, p, must be the minimal cost path.

There is a logical explanation.

There's nothing to test.

So we have these models argument as war, argument as proof and argument as performance.

His argument was most convincing.

There's the audience in rhetorical arguments.

There's a logical explanation for this.

The argument has no force.

It's the beginning of the causal chain for science.

Let's just say, just for the sake of argument, that it was a comeon.

There's a perfectly logical explanation for all this.

Instruments that record, analyze, summarize, organize debate and explain information

Alright, so let's look at one of the illusions here.

Can you imagine yourself watching yourself argue,

listen to at least three radio stations a day.

That's not a very helpful model for arguing, but it's a pretty common and entrenched model for arguing.

And you give me your reasons.

So that's what they call a stem cell line.

There was a lot of gunfire, there were a lot of philosophical discussions he had with the gang members.

You're such a debater, M. Pierre.

Define controversial.

And it sort of worked, but it didn't work very well.

His argument is more radical than yours.

And finally this is really the worst thing arguments don't seem to get us anywhere they're dead ends.

They got along famously until the very end of the meal, and then they got into a furious argument.

The irreligious scoffed at the bishop's interpretation.

It's this non zero sumness stuff you just heard a little bit about.

Let's not argue for the sake of arguing.

I've heard that argument before.

One is why do we argue? Who benefits from arguments?

This magenta distance minus this light blue distance.

It's clear that our arguments don't overlap at all.

He illustrated his theory with examples.

He illustrated the theory with facts.

The teacher illustrated his theory with pictures.

The teacher explained his theory using pictures.

So, I want you to just think about it for a moment.

And what the hell does that mean to you?

But in America you have to explain. What are clubs?

Now, just one more thing.

How do you account for your absence from the meeting?

And the tools are highly inaudible so unlike that, that statement that was done before.

For the sake of argument, let's say that

It's no use arguing with him.

It's no use arguing with him.