It is the dominant way of thinking about arguments.

Can you imagine yourself watching yourself argue,

I think that he is in the right in this dispute.

I've heard that argument before.

(Applause)

We are meeting today to discuss

However, I will also tell you that I'm one of those who doesn't believe that this is the sole answer.

And I'm not just an academic, I'm a philosopher, so I like to think that I'm actually pretty good at arguing.

And essentially, structure forms at all scales at once.

And finally this is really the worst thing arguments don't seem to get us anywhere they're dead ends.

So what I would like to do today is have something of a discussion.

I think that's wrong, but (Laughter)

I like to think I have an open mind.

I find myself much less on the optimality camp.

I have a suggestion.

So that's the, the goal of, of this segment.

I find no logic in his argument.

Is this a viable interpretation of the data or the text?

I wish to discuss something with you.

So why should anyone care?

listen to at least three radio stations a day.

He just couldn't capture the picture. And so they were talking back and forth about this question.

Hal, I won't argue with you any more.

The matter is not open for debate.

Objection.Argumentative.

And quite frankly, we're putting our heads in the sand.

They got along famously until the very end of the meal, and then they got into a furious argument.

The long discussion came to an end at last.

(Laughter)

I don't believe in nowin scenarios.

And the great irony and tragedy of our time is that a lot of the general public thinks that science is still arguing about that.

This is a case with no room for generalizations or arguments

The discussion was heated.

You're such a debater, M. Pierre.

Define controversial.

I tell you what, the best donation to the Marshal's pension fund wins the argument.

You could get fairly sophisticated with your mathematics.

Your argument precludes the ability of a nowin scenario?

Now, can you imagine an argument in which you are the arguer, but you're also in the audience, watching yourself argue?

What's our cosmonaut friend hiding?

There's the audience in rhetorical arguments.

I think you've imagined a good arguer, an arguer that's worthy of the kind of arguer you should try to be.

I mean, who can debate instead of just argue.

There is no disputing about tastes.

So I don't want to hear about it any more.