Define controversial.

And to tell you the truth,

Objection.Argumentative.

I didn't come here to argue.

His argument is more radical than yours.

You're such a debater, M. Pierre.

Let's not argue for the sake of arguing.

And finally this is really the worst thing arguments don't seem to get us anywhere they're dead ends.

Can you imagine yourself watching yourself argue,

Had something to discuss.

These inputs are sometimes called operands. They are sometimes called arguments.

Now, can you imagine an argument in which you are the arguer, but you're also in the audience, watching yourself argue?

Discussion of licensing issues

Discussing look'n'feel issues

No, he is on his way to Damascus. Come back on Sunday.

Let's proceed with the items on the agenda.

There was a group of experts who were invited to discuss the future of the city of New York in 1860.

He just couldn't capture the picture. And so they were talking back and forth about this question.

The bell went off right in the middle of our discussion.

So what's the next step for Ethiopia?

A long discussion boiled down to a realistic conclusion.

The long discussion reached a realistic conclusion.

Quite frankly, there's nothing much more to discuss.

So we have these models argument as war, argument as proof and argument as performance.

(Laughter)

There's nothing to test.

Because of the oil, everybody talked about the polilution.

She argues for the sake of arguing.

She argues just for the sake of arguing.

And I'm not just an academic, I'm a philosopher, so I like to think that I'm actually pretty good at arguing.

There's the audience in rhetorical arguments.

So we're pulling out all the stops.

Number six biotech disaster.

When countries get together in places like Copenhagen, they shouldn't just discuss the CO2.

Once you go on that vacation, there's nothing left over.

It's the beginning of the causal chain for science.

Even if it's copyrighted?

This is a discussion around an article called,

listen to at least three radio stations a day.

We're at last starting to debate this issue, and the benefits that are available for designing for the ears in education, unbelievable.

Is intellectual property a fair system?

I think you've imagined a good arguer, an arguer that's worthy of the kind of arguer you should try to be.

Good music follows some rules of composition good arguments follow some rules of logic.

Is it still ethical?

For the sake of argument, let's say that