This is a discussion around an article called,

So that's what they call a stem cell line.

And what that means is that I argue.

Let's not argue for the sake of arguing.

listen to at least three radio stations a day.

I'll come back to discussion about why that's not a good control group in a moment.

In fact,

I had him in that discussion.

You can't help but think that.

(Laughter)

Her argument was founded on fact.

You're such a debater, M. Pierre.

Define controversial.

It is no use arguing with him about it.

I don't like arguing.

They amplified their argument by new facts.

Objection.Argumentative.

I've heard that argument before.

Good music follows some rules of composition good arguments follow some rules of logic.

Can you imagine yourself watching yourself argue,

Well, there are some other puzzles.

Let's carry on the discussion.

Let's be done with the argument.

Let's end this debate.

This magenta distance minus this light blue distance.

And the tools are highly inaudible so unlike that, that statement that was done before.

For the sake of argument, let's say that

He wins his arguments by logical reasoning.

Is intellectual property a fair system?

His argument was based on facts.

like 'President of the United States of America'? (Laughter)

The chair recognizes no further discussion.

His argument is more radical than yours.

And finally this is really the worst thing arguments don't seem to get us anywhere they're dead ends.

Now, can you imagine an argument in which you are the arguer, but you're also in the audience, watching yourself argue?

Discussion of licensing issues

Discussing look'n'feel issues

Can you do that?

Will, that was a bit much.

E. O. F.

Then the discussion is over

Captain, whether the law is right or wrong is not my concern.

Her argument was not built on facts.

Her argument was not based on facts.

So we have these models argument as war, argument as proof and argument as performance.