Now, in economic theory, cheating is a very simple cost benefit analysis.

They acquire a library of intellectual property rights, then litigate to earn profits.

Now, he said, we know from experience that the farther up from the ground you go, the stronger the wind blows.

let's do it on an accrual basis.

How much would it cost?

All the profits go toward Phillip's hospital bills.

GDP Household expenditures which was Firm revenues which was Firm expenses profit which is household income (I'll just write Inc. for Income) and of course household income is then (or at least in this case it ended up being equal to) household expenses.

And that needs to be recognized, first of all, that peacekeeping works.

And you weigh these options out you do the simple cost benefit analysis, and you decide whether it's worthwhile to commit the crime or not.

We do not release vehicles until all impound fees are paid.

Now, what's missing from the larger debate is a comprehensive cost benefit analysis between not fixing an unhealthy, environmentally challenged community, versus incorporating structural, sustainable changes.

Sometimes you have to pay salespeople, so you might have sales expense, and then the stuff like the corporate office and the CEO's salary, and you have to hire auditors and accountants and all of that.

A dollar... A dollar ten?

OK, in 2007, we had an equipment expense.

Cost of Goods Sold.

The last one I wanted to talk about was dialogue.

The results will look much better.

When somebody comes to me and ask for what I am known,

To figure out the cash from operations from actually how much cash the operations are producing.

And how they were going to create demand was through search ads, social media, stadium promotions.

Benefits accrue to the community from reconstruction.

So in month 4, we can actually put it in our income statement at 200, and then we had 100 of expenses, so that we have this 100 right over here.

In the breaks of your TEDx event, it's good to provide food and beverages.

But that's not how much income we made, because there was a

listen, refine something and go back.

Now, month four You cater the last customer's event.

Uh, here there's a rider wanted,

Spare no expense.

Spare no expense.

I'm not paying for you to stay here.

Or now we have a few more choices.

And that month, we said we had 400 of revenue, 200 of expense, 400 minus 200 gives us 200 of income.

little region of super pixel corresponds to. So, note the complexity reduction.

They're your machines, and you're renting the space.

Really? I wonder why?

It's a matter of cost.

Their focus is always about anticipated consequences.

But actually, it's not my fault it's from the Guardian newspaper.

At what cost?

Walt, there's always a way.

It's not cheap either.

So wait a minute, you're getting 90 but you spent a total of 53 building the product and keeping the lights on and that leaves right in the middle how much profit you have.

Cash, 500,000.

So they're the variable costs.

That means your revenue to your company would not be 100 but 90.