He wins his arguments by logical reasoning.

His argument is more radical than yours.

His argument is rational.

Then we have what I believe are the ideas in conflict.

Believe me, I am completely focused.

A long discussion boiled down to a realistic conclusion.

The long discussion reached a realistic conclusion.

Think of all the roles that people play in arguments.

Is intellectual property a fair system?

I won't be drawn into a philosophical discussion.

The throng protested against abortion.

The bell went off right in the middle of our discussion.

He gets up there and then he ... comes back up. They're still talking about it.

And, we need to have this sort of.

Why don't we discuss it over Chinese?

So we have these models argument as war, argument as proof and argument as performance.

Concentrate all fire on their engines.

Let's not argue for the sake of arguing.

listen to at least three radio stations a day.

For the sake of argument, let's say that

Charles Darwin believed in group selection.

First of all, I'd like to give you an argument for why that list is complete.

Can you imagine yourself watching yourself argue,

When I think about arguments, I'm talking about

You're such a debater, M. Pierre.

Define controversial.

Or did you actually believe that capitalism and free markets were one and the same thing?

Let's stop the arguing for about two minutes in here.

But after that,

That's the kind of argument we want.

Discussion of licensing issues

Discussing look'n'feel issues

And there we are, 2001.

We have been so consumed with seemingly objective discussions of politics, tactics, weapons, dollars and casualties.

In a sense, I am turning around the argument made by David Riesman in The Lonely Crowd.

People are taking sides on the abortion issue.

But obviously, there's a debate here.

The data to be discussed below was collected in the following way.

There was a group of experts who were invited to discuss the future of the city of New York in 1860.

She argues for the sake of arguing.

She argues just for the sake of arguing.

She argues just for the sake of arguing.

I've heard that argument before.

How does it apply over here? And you answer my question.

That doesn't seem very fair, which brings me to the third argument, the argument of the heart.