We only burn up a small amount of the uranium that's in there, we take it out and we stick it in a spent fuel pool.

He's efficient, he's precise.

let's compare that with a number I've just mentioned.

That's inefficient.

Be fast.

Admittedly, trying to capture all of these effects leads to a lot of work and possibly inefficient shaders.

I needed tools that were robust, modular, highly efficient and optimized,

Here. The Pirate Bay. And that's all.

Fish farms pollute most of them do anyway and they're inefficient.

And ever since then, I've wondered why it is that capitalism is so amazingly efficient at some things, but so inefficient at others, why it's so innovative in some ways and so un innovative in others.

Copyright is a property system.

So now we have two reasons why the naive Bayes assumption is a good thing.

There's a way to practice intelligently.

This has 10 characters. It is way too long.

What happens is you have crossing over, and it's a surprisingly organized process.

They are generally slow.

For nonconformity.

And this next shot here is one of the lunchrooms.

That's gotta be convenient.

It's not about the things that it brings.

Also, we see how we measure the aerodynamic efficiency.

And if so in this case I'm counting it as a half because I wrote this inefficiently.

What SUNDAR stands for, in Hindi, is attractive.

We had knowledge about the electromechanical efficiency and then we can calculate the aerodynamic efficiency.

Commerce, on the other hand, is relatively quick, essentially creative, highly effective and efficient, and fundamentally honest, because we can't exchange value for very long if we don't trust each other.

Then it goes forward, then it goes backward, and does so multiple times until it finally has turned around.

you can see now the whole thing takes up far less space.

But the heaps that we were talking about the overhead is pretty raw and we get this kind of running time, the elapse should be pretty efficient.

Maybe a decade, according to my friends in Detroit.

So the total running time ends up being we do (nlogk) operations.

Kill them once

But that's a mistake.

Could you enhance certain effects? Probably so.

We can't do that today because solar panels are heavy, expensive and very inefficient.

It's expensive and it's inefficient

And that is lead theoreticians at least to find efficient in one particular way sometimes and that is that an algorithm is efficient if it has a polynomial bound on its running time.

So I'm going to talk about some projects that have explored these ideas.

A superorganism can basically take what it wants.

Anybody who's trying to sell you biofuels, or this kind of thing, what do you do about the thermodynamic inefficiency of combustion engines?

But, for subtle reasons, that we will see later, it turns out to be much more computationally efficient to make predictions on all of the prices of all of your houses doing it the way on the left than the way on the right than if you were to write your own formula.

You should study in an efficient manner.

That health that you're working on cannot be sustainable without infrastructure.

But if these machines have been around for almost 30 years, why don't we know about them?

So this canary was a living alarm, and a very efficient one.

Was highly effective.