So let me switch colors just to ease the monotony.

It's just a faster way of saying

Let's say that we don't know that they're truly equal.

looks neutral.

So a lot of people immediately will figure out the Price to

So in 2013 you'll be making 16.

That's still way more expensive than most companies.

If I'm paying 10 today for 2 of earnings in 2009, the Price to Earnings of 5 for Company A.

So growth is the other reason why you're willing to pay a higher Price to Earnings ratio.

Yesterday's turnover on the stock market was 500 million shares.

The price here, Company B was more.

Divided by 0.35.

Again sent tremors through the financial markets

Price to Earnings ratio.

Why wouldn't I just pour all of my money?

He's a stockbroker.

So just when you look at it superficially right here, when you take Price to Earnings and actually just as a little aside, whenever someone says the Price to Earnings ratio is 10, or the Price to Earnings for Company B is 4, the first thing you should ask is, what earnings are you using?

SCOTT Inc.'s stocks are blue chip stocks.

I want to sell the stock for as much as possible.

And if you want to look at earnings per share, EPS, is this number divided by the number of shares was 0.35.

It is a customary contraction like our

'Company.' It is a customary contraction like our

It's actually horrible.

goodness.

But you say, no but these guys are growing so fast in 2011 they're going to make 4.

My son has been successfully subdued, so I think this is a good time to learn about the Price to Earnings ratio.

If it's growing 100 a year for 20 years, this is actually a very good deal.

Stockbroker.

Stockbroker?

And all of that's great, and it's fine.

But here, the Price to Earnings for 2009 then becomes let's see.

They've never made money.

So... what do we need to make this work?

And you?

To figure out total earnings, we would take this number and multiply by the number of shares.

So for those people who did choose to participate, the more choices available, the more likely people were to completely avoid stocks or equity funds.

And maybe this guy's even growing faster, so maybe they're being conservative by only giving this guy a 10 price to earnings.

Why would someone be willing to pay a Price to Earnings ratio of 10 for Company A and pass up, or maybe not want to buy, Company B, even though they're paying only a Price to

I think they're CFC.

And equity securities you're probably familiar with.

What do you know about his personal life?

So, in that situation, you can actually short, you can actually short the stock which in very high level is bet the stock is going to go down.

Then we can talk about what it actually means and if we have time, we can have a discussion on why a company might have a higher or lower Price to Earnings Ratio.

So essentially, whoever lent Loan C, all of these shares are now their shares.

GE announced the acquisition of the company Laku for 30 million.