Well that's the smallest number that's a multiple of both two and three.

Negative 1 2 times negative 4 is positive 2.

Well, 100 is divisible by 2, so 100 is actually the least common multiple of 100 and 2.

Jared Jared is twice the age of his brother.

If you want the rainbow, you must have the rain.

And then train B, I'll do in this green color.

That's the beauty of democracy.

We have a micron. Here is a micron which is a millionth for the meter and a thousand times smaller than that is nanometer.

If we want to use flour in the same proportion we need to use, 3 times the flour we need flour times 3 2x3 6 cups of flour

So here it looks like it's the negative 1 2 of it.

So, let me give you a proof that if a search tree satisfies the four invariants, then it has super small height.

Well, no times.

So this is the third piece of rope here.

The measures of the interior angles of a pentagon are 2x, 6x, 4x minus 6, 2x minus 16, and 6x plus 2.

It's about a tenth of a millimeter,

And 4 and 3 don't share any prime factors with each other.

It turns out that what we want for, what we'll call the common denominator, it turns out to be the least common multiple of two and three.

Double

Select the second of two lengths whose ratio is the factor of the scaling...

Double your money back in two days.

Well what's the least common multiple of two and three?

And that's what?

So the second one was the shortest one just reading it, right?

It makes them easier to add.

Ok, and then they say the third piece of rope is three times as long as the second piece of rope.

But the simple constants just scale.

Then we'll have to do the same thing over here.

We start off at 14, which is not odd.

That tells us to add 44 into z, giving it a total of 66.

If I did minus 0.01, it would make a super small vector right there pointing in that direction.

40g white sugar.

Double my money?

When I raise something to the fifth power, that's just like saying 2 to the tenth times 2 to the tenth times 2 to the tenth times 2 to the tenth times 2 to the tenth, right?

And they told us the first piece of rope the first piece of rope is twice as long as the second piece of rope.

All right, so they say the first piece of rope is twice as long as the second piece of rope.

It has a very easy relationship with the radius.

3 times 4 times 1 2.

And what's the perimeter? What's the perimeter?

So 2 is clearly the smaller number here so we clearly get 2 is less than 3.

let's try this out (x) is 1 (z) is 2.

Well, the longest piece of rope is clearly piece 3.

Well it's decreasing by 4.

Least common multiple

Are they comparable in speed?

I'll pay twice what it's worth.