Capital offence!

No offence, simply business.

He took offence at her.

PRlNCE And for that offence

Offence obstructing a superior technician

for what offence was she killed?

I'm sorry, I meant no offence.

She took offence at my word.

She easily takes offence at trifles.

'Verb' refers to the predicate verb. Predicate verbs change their form depending on the subject and the time expressed.

Any offence against himself he forgave readily.

The law prescribes certain penalties for this offence.

Now I see, there's no offence at all.

And they have been persisting in the heinous offence.

I found it truly regrettable that he should take offence.

He behaved himself so as not to give offence to others.

Such an offence is punished by a fine and or imprisonment.

For example, I'll show you the successor state axiom for the In predicate.

Well... the very rich can afford to give offence wherever they go.

and who I am eager shall forgive me my offence on the Day of Doom.

Woe unto the world because of offences, but woe unto them through whom the offence cometh.

If we have a predicate Possible of A and S, is an action A possible in a state?

But over here on the right I've put this sort of if conditional, a guard or a predicate we might call it in mathematics, and this is saying I only want you to yield those numbers for which the predicate is true.

No offence, gentlemen, but you have a reputation. I wouldn't be speaking to you if I had a choice.

The very rich can afford to give offence wherever they go. We need not care for his good opinion.

So for all A and S for which it's possible to execute A in situation S, the In predicate holds if and only if the action was a load or the In predicate used to hold in the previous state and the action is not an unload.

If it's con , by convention, if a method returns a inaudible , or is a predicate, you end up with a, a question mark.

And the convention is that they refer to a specific situation, and we always put that situation argument as the last in the predicate.

And now instead of describing the actions that are applicable in a situation with a predicate Actions of S, situation calculus for some reason decided not to do that and instead we're going to talk about the actions that are possible in the state, and we're going to do that with a predicate.

The predicate is that part that shows the action in the sentence. In Japanese it would be the part that ends in da , suru , etc.

Instead of writing 1 action or 1 schema or 1 axiom for each action, we do 1 for each fluent, for each predicate that can change.

If that's true, then the In predicate holds between some cargo C and some plane in the state, which is the result of executing action A in state S.

And anyone who commits an offence or a sin, then charges an innocent person with it, shall certainly bear the guilt of a calumny and a manifest sin.

Dr. Kemp's solar lamp was lit, albeit the sky was still bright with the sunset light, and his blinds were up because there was no offence of peering outsiders to require them pulled down.

For loops are structured essentially the same way they are in C, were we have an initializer value, then a predicate to evaluate for, when the for loop should end, and then an expression to execute at the end of each for loop.

If any of your women is guilty of unnatural offence, bring four of your witnesses to give evidence if they testify against them, retain them in the houses until death overtakes them or God provides some other way for them.

(Just think how erroneous you were,) when you passed this lie on from one tongue to the other and uttered with your mouths that of which you had no knowledge. You took it as a trifling matter whereas it was a grave offence in the sight of Allah.

If statements work essentially the same way that they would in any other language, where you have the keyword if, then in parenthesis you specify the predicate that's going to return a boolean value, either true or false and then the body of the if statement that executes, if that evaluates to true.

If a woman fears ill treatment or indifference on the part of her husband, it shall be no offence for her to seek a reconciliation, for reconciliation is best. But people are prone to selfish greed. If you do good and fear Him, surely God is aware of what you do.

And then we start branching on the possible actions, so say one possible action would be to load the cargo, C1, onto the plane, P1, at SFO, and then that would bring us to another state which would have a different set of state variables set, and we'd continue branching out like that until we hit a state which satisfied the goal predicate.

So that In predicate will hold if and only if either A was a load action so if we load the cargo into the plane, then the result of executing that action A is that the cargo is in the plane or it might be that it was already true that the cargo was in the plane in situation S and A is not equal to an unload action.

When you have divorced your wives absolutely and they have completed their prescribed term, then you should not prevent them from marrying their prospective husbands, if they mutually agree to marry each other in a lawful way. You are enjoined not to commit such an offence, if you sincerely believe in Allah and the Last Day. It is most decent and pure for you to desist from this Allah knows and you do not know.