That's a utilitarian moral framework.

Is it a utilitarian object?

It's a utilitarian article, that's why.

Same with furniture, it's too utilitarian.

If you feel that way, that's a utilitarian choice.

The same goes for every other utilitarian occupation in existence.

Jeremy Bentham, the great utilitarian philosopher, once spiked this argument.

But too utilitarian? I mean is that the way you think of fashion?

By whose compact utilitarian heap The present may sit down and go to sleep,

The utilitarian roles that humans assume in society today are fundamentally technical by nature.

English political philosopher gave first the first clear systematic expression to the utilitarian moral theory.

And what we mean when we say that are things that we would consider to be non utilitarian.

I was a ceramic designer for about 10 years, and just loved utilitarian form simple things that we use every day,

How can we get away from the mouse and use our full bodies as a way of exploring aesthetic experiences, not necessarily utilitarian ones.

You need machines. You need cars. You need vehicles.

I need one I need one I need one!

You need me Need me

We need help. We need help.

We need variety. We need surprise.

I need you I need you

I need... I need to feed.

We need muscle, and we need enforcers. Payback. That's what we need.

I need help, Kimble. I need time.

We need to know what you need.

We need data, we don't need help.

We need to we need to educate.

They don't need pep. I need pep.

I need pilots and I need fighters.

But we need heroes! We need you.

We need rules, we need a leader.

I'll need passports. I'll need plane tickets.

What's a need? Well, a need might be a need to be entertained or a need to communicate.

But we do need 4, don't need 2, and we do need 1.

Energy need

No need.

No need

We need?

I need?

A need.

Need I.D.

Need anything?

I need...

No need.

No need.

I'd need...