I've written four statements, four claims, that refer to that optimization okay phrasing or procedure from before.

procedure

procedure

She claims the inheritance.

Routine procedure.

Here I've written four claims.

He claims he had instructions.

Archer claims to be impartial.

What he claims he needs.

A farm worker! He claims he's He claims he's a doctor. ( tender theme playing )

Here's the procedure.

It's standard procedure.

Masaru claims that he is innocent.

He claims that he is honest.

And he claims basic web features

Here I've written down four claims.

At least he claims he doesn't.

He claims we got our man.

Please explain the procedure.

Please explain the procedure.

So that's the procedure.

Now onto procedure 3.

He never follows procedure.

This is the procedure.

YYou wanted the procedure.

What's your normal procedure?

He claims he knows nothing about her.

He claims that he is a painter.

To the orphan with claims of relationship,

Anja Laeremans. A prostitute, the barman claims.

We're en route to verify his claims.

Your editor claims he never sent you.

We have evidence that supports your claims.

Why does agreement to certain procedure, even a fair procedure, justify whatever result flows from the operation of that procedure?

The correct answer is that procedure 1 will terminate, procedure 2 will not terminate for all n, and procedure 3 will terminate.

Our procedure should return 5.

This procedure does not halt.

We'll define our find_element procedure.

This is called procedure composition.

The procedure will return 3.

Gold squadron, begin takeoff procedure.

There's a procedure, a ritual.

But you know the procedure?

You don't understand the procedure.

Will he survive the procedure?