It's mostly farmland.

The basin of a river usually has rich farmland.

We don't understand how they live in the farmland.

Construction spread to the hills and farmland surrounding the city.

Now, the farmland I'm used to seeing is clumps of trees surrounded by fields.

I remember when this was all farmland as far as the eye could see.

Ways of reclaiming overused farmland, so that within two years they can again be productive.

George Soros and his big corporate monolith went in and started buying up the farmland.

The South and West became agricultural hubs, and in other parts of the country, suburbs took over farmland.

That's roughly double the amount of people that we can currently feed from an average acre of conventional arable farmland.

So we could grow more food by expanding farmland, but we'd better not, because it's ecologically a very, very dangerous thing to do.

Tonight's episode Along an isolated stretch of farmland in Northern Nebraska, a construction company builds the sleek asphalt ribbon of a new superhighway.

Family members had bribed officials to interrupt the hereditary transfer of land by having the brothers declared dead, allowing them to inherit their father's share of the ancestral farmland.

So why does it take so much manpower and energy to sustain farmland when you look at a natural eco system, and we've got a wood behind us, and that can just keep going?

Learning here intensively for one year, two years or three years, since most of them are landless, and since there are many patches of abandoned farmland in rural areas, they buy such plots, and make living there, sometimes become full time farmers.

Or if we imagine the New York City metropolitan area, currently home to 12 million people, but 12 million people in the future, perhaps living at the density of Manhattan, in only 36 percent of the area, with the areas in between covered by farmland, covered by wetlands, covered by the marshes we need.