Just their footprint?

The next thing is What about the footprint? Stewart mentioned the footprint.

People confuse footprint with spacing.

This means lower carbon footprint.

left a footprint on another world.

So let's forget your environmental footprint.

Let's think about your ethical footprint.

We protect them, just their footprint.

turned, you know, a part of the evil empire into a zero footprint, or almost zero footprint business.

That's the footprint that is always being confused.

I have the same footprint as a pedestrian

Just protecting their footprint when they are small.

So how can they address this remaining water footprint?

We'll reduce not only calories, but our carbon footprint.

After that, we let weeds grow on their footprint.

Is that what you made out of that footprint?

For wind, there's a larger area, but much smaller footprint.

Because when we see someone walks, we see the footprint.

And we would leave a very low footprint on the planet.

And this doesn't even account for the footprint on the ground.

One of them is that every society has an ecological footprint.

In my experience, in fact, the light footprint was extremely helpful.

I'm an organic food eating, carbon footprint minimizing, robotic surgery geek.

Oh, we weed their footprint when they are still in infancy?

We had progress in elections all of this with the so called light footprint.

We're gonna find a little island in the Aegean without a single footprint on it.

That, because the footprint, as you can see, is just the pole touching the ground.

That would take between one and three square kilometers of footprint on the ground, entirely.

Furthermore, it's simply not true that what went wrong in Afghanistan is the light footprint.

We reckon that we are a bit over halfway to our goal zero impact, zero footprint.

A footprint, a careless word, a remembered image in the eye of a stranger, a match.

The two numbers are zero as in zero footprint or zero oil and scale it infinity.

We'd dramatically reduce the human footprint on Earth by building more cities that people can move to.

Instead, we maybe want to freeze the footprint of agriculture and farm the lands we have better.

So I just thought, I'm going to capture thumbprint, footprint, or whatever traces we leave as humans.

What they're finding is what many are calling the chemtrail geoengineering footprint of aluminum, barium, and strontium.

So what can they do about this remaining water footprint that can have serious effects on the ecosystem?

So I'm going to suggest that less stuff and less space are going to equal a smaller footprint.

Due to the Ballbot system, it has a very small footprint and it's also easy to move around.

At Interface we really intend to bring this prototypical sustainable, zero footprint industrial company fully into existence by 2020.

Smaller space is going to make for smaller utilities save some more money there, but also a smaller footprint.

And on their footprint, many living beings are born, live, mature and leave offsprings to accumulate into the layer.

And again, when you start seeing that kind of embrace, and you start looking at them leading their rural lifestyle with a very, very small footprint and moving into an urban lifestyle with a much higher footprint, it starts to become very sobering.

There's another thing happening around the country, which is that companies are starting to get concerned about their water footprint.

Actually, the footprint on the ground for wind is by far the smallest of any energy source in the world.