This inequality.

And then we have inequality.

That won't change the inequality.

So the inequality will switch.

like Entropy production inequality, whatever.

It's an inequality, not an equation, it's an inequality sign, not an equal sign.

And again, closely related to inequality.

They're demographics, education, debt and inequality.

You don't do anything to the inequality

We want to swap the inequality right?

But let's see what the inequality is.

But since we are multiplying an inequality by a negative number you have to swap the inequality sign.

And remember, when you multiply or divide both sides of an inequality by a negative, you swap the inequality.

Have this inequality expressed in terms of mu.

And now this is a pretty straightforward inequality.

No reason to change the inequality just yet.

No reason to change the inequality just yet.

But remember, when you multiply or divide both sides of an inequality by a negative number, you swap the inequality.

Once again, when you multiply or divide both sides of an inequality by a positive number, it doesn't change the inequality.

Meanwhile government isn't helping decades of rising inequality. laughter

And that's one of the distinctions of an inequality.

OK, which inequality is shown on the graph below?

I can add or subtract without messing up the inequality.

But we want to know what makes this inequality true.

We have some inequality and then we have a 0.

We can divide both sides of this inequality by 3.

Once again, no reason to change the inequality just yet.

The right hand side of the inequality is negative 12y.

Notice, when I divide both sides of the inequality by a negative number, I swap the inequality, the greater than becomes a less than.

The important thing you need to realize, though, when you do it with an inequality is that when you multiply or divide both sides of the equation by a negative number, you swap the inequality. you swap the inequality

But we have to remember, when you multiply or divide both sides of an inequality by a negative number, you have to swap the inequality.

And when you multiply both sides of an inequality by a negative number or divide both sides by a negative number, you swap the inequality.

No inequality should be allowed to exist between men and women.

Here it is in relation to that same measure of inequality.

So the inequality stays the same as in our original problem.

And it's getting harder to hide assets, tax avoidance, pay inequality.

If we set c₂ to 2, it will satisfy this inequality.

That definitely satisfies the first inequality. Lets see the second one.

Yes, the inequality goes in this direction, or I would posit it.

So what we're looking at is general social disfunction related to inequality.

I think I'm looking and talking about the psychosocial effects of inequality.

The same countries, the same measure of inequality, one problem after another.

It's only when you multiply by negatives that you swap the inequality.

Even in wealthy countries it is common now to see inequality growing.

And you might be saying, hey, aren't all inequality problems deceptively tricky?