Again, what do you think could help us get the right answer this time?

So what I do is I figure out, well, given your assumptions

When you're done with this, you arrive at a number that now combines the cancer hypothesis with the test result.

I can't imagine.

But one thing that's happened, a lot of people said, oh, Sal, you're making oversimplifying assumptions.

So, what do we do now?

I have no need of that hypothesis.

Don't torture yourself with hypotheticals.

Setup Virtual Machine

Hypothetically.

Along this wall, y is a constant, right?

Olivia, this isn't like before.

I'll assume it's just a function of x.

This is what I assume about annual maintenance.

So this is all just running descriptives to figure out if you truly have normal distributions.

Though I'm not implying you're correct in any of your assumptions.

At the end of the day, you can always rig this number based on the assumptions you make.

That was just a kind of a what if conversation.

And then what's the derivative of y squared with respect to x?

Because we'll see later in this video that to some degree, that assumption is one of the biggest drivers of assumption.

These simplifying assumptions will allow us to do an analysis that is more tractable.

Suddenly, it's not so hypothetical, is it?

If you were dying of thirst. What he would or wouldn't do doesn't interest me.

We're assuming that the coin can't land on its edge and remain standing straight up.

Okay, what assumptions did you make?

Seems the logical assumption.

What's it's going to do is to make a graph with n nodes if n is just 1, it returns a single node all by itself.

So before I go on with how we're going to approach this problem,

So what I did in yellow, both this bright yellow and this

You can change it.

I have a normal coin.

This is all hypothetical, isn't it, Tom? All academic?

Kathleen's idea,

Because it is a little bit of a game.

Property tax, same thing.

Let me illustrate this for you.

You can configure how many virtual desktops there are.

John's hypothetical man

And our null hypothesis is equals p 0.9 and our alternate hypothesis, if it doesn't work, as well as the null hypothesis, so p is smaller than 0.9.

The year after that it's 35.

Well what's this term going to do?

That assumption is further substantiated by the presence of a dog at the scene of the crime.

That's one hell of an assumption.

So he wasn't drunk...

Uh oh, we loop forever.