He drew his conclusions based on that survey.

We're born problem solvers.

This one has no y at all in it.

Pull over.

From this initial observation, we derive a hypothesis.

Right?

To flip my door, I can now do the same trick I did over here.

On our fourth rung, a very crucial thing happens.

This meant they must have been closer together in the past.

Now I want to talk about approximate inference by means of sampling.

She cleared out her bank accounts this morning.

What's the next step after replacing subtrees?

For example, a network that's a linear string of variables,

This stuff is also really easy to relearn, provided you have a really strong grounding in reasoning.

look at the parts we have available and mix and match them to figure out what sort of gear trains we can use, and then look at the power and force you can get out of your upper body to analyze how fast you should be able to go in this chair as you put your arms up and down the levers.

it's a theory.

We don't care about the test result as much as we care about the fact whether we have cancer or not.

Eventually, I was able to deduce most of their huge logical alphabet.

Well, Bruce, my boy so the portrait is really finished, is it really finished?

We start her up and just ram the shit out of his truck.

Generally I think there are what I mean by that is, boil things down to their fundamental truths and reason up from there, as opposed to reasoning by analogy.

There's the audience in rhetorical arguments.

So I want to get rid of this 2x right over here.

Life is the art of drawing sufficient conclusions from insufficient premises.

So I'm gonna remove a Y, I'm gonna remove Y mass from both sides. Now what will that look like algebraically?

I will draw you, Saruman, as poison is drawn from a wound.

For every one of every two of these horses, there's one dog.

We derive further pleasure from our study.

Four years ago I worked with a few people at the Brookings Institute, and I arrived at a conclusion.

I'm asking if it's possible.

The expectation is that they read quickly.

And the best way to do that, we can subtract 22 from both sides.

Do you guys see how this, right here, compared to that which one creates that patient problem solving, that math reasoning?

So 3 times 4 is 12.

So if I subtract, that's minus 18, if I subtract 18 from the right hand side, I also have to do it from the left hand side.

So to get rid of it, we're going to subtract 16 from both sides of this equation.

And, instead of dealing just with information, we can tease out knowledge.

I will not speculate as to what might have happened.

In the drawer.

Your mind is expelling him.

Of a multibillion dollar conglomerate out of his office?

If we want to get rid of this 2 here on the left hand side, we could subtract 2 from both sides.

Every time we run out of cash, we want to go back to the till.

let me just rewrite 20 minus 7y is equal to 6y minus 6.

This is 146 is equal to 180.