It has to be. It's the only possible explanation.

If x equals 5, x plus 4 is 9, and this dimension right here is going to be 5.

We're just saying x minus 1 over x plus 2 is just straight up greater than 0.

If you're under 50 we want you to work four more years.

Tra la! What ho!

And let's say it's 0 everywhere else.

Any reasonable explanations?

We're reasonable people.

You could do it that way.

Well, you're acting that way.

I'm sure when they find who did this there will be a reasonable explanation...

Obviously your rent doesn't increase every month, but I assume it does fairly continuously.

They can't do that anymore. That's impossible.

And in both macro and micro economics, there is especially in the modern sense of it, there is an attempt to make them rigorous, to make them mathematical.

Tough, yet rational and ethical.

There are as many different ways of being rational as there are human beings on the planet, and that's one of the glories of human existence.

I reject it, in which case no one gets anything. Okay?

There's gotta be a rational explanation.

It's not about the things that it brings.

The same is true over here.

Yes, you're right.

Can I still put any x value in here and get a reasonable answer?

Next day his luggage arrived through the slush and very remarkable luggage it was.

The chance that she was innocent was one in 73 million.

I wouldn't exactly call any of this rational.

So or a is less than 0 and b is less than 0.

Mother Theresa, she was rational.

So I'm going to solve this integral for you intuitively, and I think it'll make some sense.

And, again, it's because of an alignment of the incentives.

And so therefore there could be a large amount of dark matter in these galaxies.

You can't pose rational questions when you're dealing with a guy like Jones.

So in this case maybe at least five or six years.

So you say, Sal, what happens if I have the money in six months?

like steal it and so on.

Phlox says there's no medical reason why they can't combine.

This is reasonable.

Maybe now that your illustrious predecessor's out of the picture, reasonable minds can prevail.

U.N. says it's a reduction with 1.8 percent.

It isn't fair.

I could see her struggling with the thing.

There aren't clear and obvious reasons to choose one side over the other, so the origin of driving conventions is a perfect opportunity for the mathematics of game theory and symmetry breaking.

At the bottom of what we can know for sure are things that are physically obvious.

If I'm going to get an 8 return on my money, that's my benefit, it makes sense for me to borrow it at 5 .

You might say, eh, that's not really irrational.

I love you. That's not rational.