GLaDOS

Proved what?

If any Aperture employee would like to opt out of this initiative, remember Science rhymes with compliance.

Shinjuku!

I even testified against him as a character witness.

Demonstrate it.

Any real proof?

Make it true.

We'll prove he's innocent.

The facts bear out this hypothesis.

And affirms goodness,

And believed the best matter to be true

and confirms the reward most fair,

And testifieth to the Good,

And believes in Al Husna.

And confirms goodness.

and affirmed the Truth of goodness

And believeth in goodness

and confirms the best promise,

and believes in the finest,

And believes in the best reward ,

for those who spend for the cause of God,

And accepts the best,

and believes in the truth of what is right,

And (in all sincerity) testifies to the best,

I think that's what all this is pointing at.

So these things together give us evolution, perhaps.

Voice authorization required.

As a sign of good faith...

I do not want to have my opinions challenged.

Here are the implantation sites.

A new hypothesis is the error is due to the quote condition evaluating to true.

And that's what these people can do.

I'm a professor, I get paid to have fanciful theories.

The fact manifests his innocence.

That fact proves his innocence.

You're not supposed to talk about the absolute nature of anything.

Another one proved innocent ... too late.

I am not opening the door until Jethro is proven innocent.

If I had more time,I could prove that he didn't do it.

The good news there's a lot that can be done.

You think this will help me out with the judge?

So to recap, we're getting our 3 parameters from the request.

From this hypothesis we have made predictions. We have made experiments.

It's such a neat instrument. I would really like to learn how to play.