To evaluate this, it starts at the inner parenthesis.

3 7 is 10.

Starbuck. Starbuck, buck, buck, buck, buck, buck, buck, buck.

It represents integer.

Back, back

W wait!

E goes to E plus E or E goes to int.

Since this one isn't recursive, there are only a finite number of strings in the language

So here's our grammar it has 4 rewrite rules.

INT string and INT alone.

So here the language of our grammar includes things like INT INl, INT INT INT.

Now let's dig into this notion of parcing states a little bit more.

I never heard of it. What's it Like?

Put it in reverse!

The stranger turned round with his back to the fireplace and put his hands behind his back.

int min minutes

int sec seconds

int alarm minutes before event to send an alarm

Prev

Next

0 Indicates that this event does not recur

1 This event recurs daily

2 This event recurs on a weekly basis

Use DEFAULT 0 instead.

What's in this bag?

Jump back.

Come back.

Your name's Buck, right?

Reverse.

Dad, back off.

int id ID of that event.

I want to see if this one string could have been produced by our grammar.

However, if we were to add a few more INTs, this trick that I've done here of reducing INT goes to INT goes to INT if I had 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 tokens,

Cheska

Let's go back!

Back it up.

All... all clear?

Neither of these rules makes the grammar ambiguous.

Fukuoka is very typical of the kind of town I like.

This time, I'm going to give you the parse tree, and I want you to tell me what the grammar would have to be.

Fill that bag up with books and put it back.

Back In Time (root)

Back the fuck up!

T Bag, or Sucre.

She won't conform to the town's social patterns.