legitimized by a democratically elected government,

Oh my goodness, here we go again.

The only way that it would move is if there is a lot more force on one side than there is on the other side

Language is subject to interpretation.

What he is saying is that something that has a constant velocity will continue to have that constant velocity indefinitely

It will occur without adding any more greenhouse gasses.

But if you put something on top of it, it disbalances it.

We've got to keep balanced!

Justice is balance.

Your life is the sum of a remainder of an unbalanced equation inherent to the programming of the Matrix.

The trade imbalance bulks large in our minds.

It has wonderful effects, and sometimes strange effects.

The ice will still not move

And these were somewhat noticed.

The ball would keep going on forever, this ice block would be going on forever

And you were to throw a ball, that ball would literally keep going in that direction forever

The first is that we will not evolve.

So this right here will be a balanced force

And the land, to depths of tens of meters, is also warming.

So, another way to rephrase what they're saying is that if there's something every body persists so everything will stay at rest or moving at a constant velocity unless it is compelled to change its state by force, unless it is acted on by a force especially an unbalanced force, and I'll explain that in a second.

He... will bring balance.

And yet, it never happens.

Military power is important.

The equalization of the oceanic

So we understand that if something is at rest, it is going to stay at rest unless there is some force that acts on it.

But what will come in the future?

A balanced force

The budget must be balanced.

After all, at least on paper, there's this notion that these state budgets are balanced.

Similarly, for the politicians, click on the right box for their strategy, which leads to the equilibrium point.

No Effect

No Effect

Doesn't work.

The reason why, if I take an object, if I take my book, and I try to slide it across the desk.

And there was a famous result from John Nash, economist, who was shown in the movie and book A Beautiful Mind proving that every game has at least 1 equilibrium point.

In some definitions you will see unless there is some unbalanced force

They got instant democracy in the 1990s elections without checks and balances.

So it's almost common sense.

And I use that word advisedly.

Then tell me the outcome for the game for each player for that equilibrium point.

But you can see those spikes, and they're there.

And no, we do not disrupt the balance.

What was the key element of this that actually caused the outrage, do you think?

And the frogs that are exposed to atrazine, the testes are full of holes and spaces, because the hormone imbalance, instead of allowing sperm to be generated, such as in the testis here, the testicular tubules end up empty and fertility goes down by as much as 50 percent.

Effect