Again, what do you think could help us get the right answer this time?

Setup Virtual Machine

Hypothetically.

So this is all just running descriptives to figure out if you truly have normal distributions.

Of course if you retain and the null is in fact true, then great you made the correct decision.

Because it is a little bit of a game.

Or the truthiness is out there. Since this is all probabilistic.

You can configure how many virtual desktops there are.

John's hypothetical man

I have no need of that hypothesis.

Don't torture yourself with hypotheticals.

This is what I assume about annual maintenance.

Olivia, this isn't like before.

And then what's the derivative of y squared with respect to x?

Let us suppose that the news is true.

Check that box if you think that would be helpful.

Warning Assuming normal speed.

That was just a kind of a what if conversation.

Assuming, of course, they text each other.

Because we'll see later in this video that to some degree, that assumption is one of the biggest drivers of assumption.

You have a sales force and you're selling directly to the end consumer.

These simplifying assumptions will allow us to do an analysis that is more tractable.

We finish this step for a search.

Suddenly, it's not so hypothetical, is it?

If you were dying of thirst. What he would or wouldn't do doesn't interest me.

But maybe y is equal to e to some constant r, times x.

So what I did in yellow, both this bright yellow and this

Okay, what assumptions did you make?

Seems the logical assumption.

This is our original y.

It could actually be 90 as advertised and you were just unlucky, but we believe that high probability of this is correct or is the data actually contradicting this claim and you should complain that the claim is incorrect.

So, what do we do now?

So, let's go back to that normal distribution.

I'll assume it's just a function of x.

This is all hypothetical, isn't it, Tom? All academic?

And our null hypothesis is equals p 0.9 and our alternate hypothesis, if it doesn't work, as well as the null hypothesis, so p is smaller than 0.9.

And you'll see what I mean because I'll change that assumption in a second.

There were other complicated shape.

That assumption is further substantiated by the presence of a dog at the scene of the crime.

When you're done with this, you arrive at a number that now combines the cancer hypothesis with the test result.

Well what's this term going to do?

Because I think that's the important thing.

Uh oh, we loop forever.

That's one hell of an assumption.

We know from definition that 1 is equal to i times i. Everything seems pretty straightforward right now. And then they'll say,