Obviously, when you put this percent here, these become the exact same number.

Or you could go down and to the left.

We have y minus y1.

This is a vector.

4 times 3 is 12.

Here's the word mirror. No, it's not the same upside down.

And the denominator would be 5 times 1, which is equal to 5.

Let's see. Let's do the third of the turn first, and then the sixth of a turn.

You can do, you know, display

So the easy thing is to figure out a, because you just do a pattern match.

When t is equal to c, you're going to have a c minus a c, and you're going to have f of 0.

One times three is three.

Well, this is the same thing as the absolute of 2.

LG Ten of diamonds, yeah.

Do you see a pattern here?

However you want to think of it, but we've solved the problem.

Yep, it's there.

So thats why this and this are the same thing.

We have x plus 90. I'm looking at the biggest triangle in this diagram right here

And this is in the context of an expression.

You say fourteen minus ten is four.

Let me define my new p of x, so let me add another term. p of x, the first terms are going to be the same.

And these things I've marked in green have the same value.

Realize all these numbers are a little bit approximate here.

And that's going to be the exact same answer as the number of times that 0.25 goes into 1.03075.

So this is simply saying from the beginning all the way to the end.

But with the differences due to having not quite the right policy,

We'll learn in a second what we do when the denominators are different.

It's safe. You can just include it verbatim.

Well, it's 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 outcomes.

And then 9000 8000 is 1000.

All sum_list does is take an input list p and calculate the sum of the numbers in p.

That's 7 times 5, and so is this.

What about f of 7?

The Fibonacci sequence is strictly nondecreasing.

Now if you take the mammary gland and spread it and take the fat away, on a dish it looks like that.

So that equals Pe to the 2r.

Let's set b equal to a.

These products are of the same quality.

This problem becomes 25 divided into 103.075.

Negatives cancel out, we could divide the numerator and the denominator by 10.

And then the focal point, the x value of the focal point is going to be x1, the same as the x value of the vertex.

2 on a c goes nowhere.

They could have put them all out in view.

Well, this one is surprisingly easy because N 1, so this thing falls out so it's the same as this thing over here 0.25.