We know that the Laplace transform of 1 is equal to 1 s.

It's the same thing.

If I tell the cops what I know about him it's just the same shit they've heard a million times already.

By settling right in the middle, by 5,000 CHF.

Well, remember the philosopher's explanation of the lady?

Dan Ariely Brown. Thank you.

You get x minus 1 over x plus 2 is greater than 0.

Everybody's wearing jeans, everybody's the same.

Two months later,

Didn't we do this yesterday?

Why do you keep saying we ?

Then why this duel? This murder?

It always ends the same way.

We both did the same thing.

Willi and Hans are colleagues.

A shocker in American jurisprudence.

We could do this one very similarly.

I told you yesterday and I'll tell you again today.

If I were in your situation, I would do the same thing.

White knows it too.

What is a equal to?

We are right at that moment where there are problems that could apparently destroy our entire life support system.

So you can prove your theory?

Because it isn't true.

That's so distorted and not true!

This isn't about the truth!

They might do the same to us.

Remind us how that was done the last time?

I just used the results from R, the same results that I got from running three regression equations.

So let's see if we can apply these same rules to division.

3 2 is 5. 5 is what we get out.

Actually, baby, you have no idea how far it's gone.

Nothing that crazy could be real.

So the power of reframing things cannot be overstated.

He gave the same answer as before.

And sure enough that equals zero.

(Laughter)

like the archaeopteryx.

I suppose it's the same in your business too, huh?

They're going to get us if we stay here.

You think what I'm thinking?

He used to be with this agency.

I could ask you the same thing.

And when that doesn't work, when it turns out that people who disagree with us have all the same facts we do and are actually pretty smart, then we move on to a third assumption they know the truth, and they are deliberately distorting it for their own malevolent purposes.

And they all stem from the same cause, from the fact that passive learning stubbornly sticks to the same policy throughout.