This is a book on Optimal Transport, it is a problem involving mathematics, engineering, probability and geometry everything that was said.

The good news is what we've got here isn't an engineering problem.

(Applause)

You know what, June?

Your problem is not technology. The problem is you.

That's the easiest thing.

It's kind of the model that has worked in other contexts.

I want you to think about how you design computer programs to solve particular problems.

We're, experiencing technical difficulties.

Most of my spam I never see, but who knows what's going to happen with the future?

So that we can get a sense of what we can expect them to do.

But the trouble with the philosophers is that they were philosophizing when they should have been science ophizing.

And that's my job.

Critical failure

That's what I'm talking about as a last mile opportunity.

Psychological scars stemming from moral conflicts... and overt sexuality.

And the reason that gives me hope is that the first thing is to admit that we have a problem.

Let's take an issue that the last two speakers have both talked about mental illness.

And they made extra problems for us.

And that's the difference between problems that are additive,

It's... much more than that.

But your weakness is not your technique.

We only have our brains to rely on.

You'll notice too from the syilabus that we don't only read these books, we also all take up contemporary political and legal controversies that raise philosophical questions.

We seem to be experimenting ... some techmological differences... so, uh, shit.

The only thing that could save her is flying.

Then one last one. f of z.

When did you get through with your engineering problem?

And this has become such a norm of our professional lives, such a norm and such an expectation.

It's gonna pose quite a legal problem.

Well, we collect data from satellites, from airplanes, from ground vehicles, from people.

Is it really practical to make things of this sort?

Still a big number, but a big drop.

A fault common to scientists is mistakenly believing that every problem has a technical solution.

Question is, to what end.

(Laughter)

That was not about society itself.

Boarding of arc 3 will be delayed due to technical difficulties.

I have some... personal issues.

Of course this is a university issue.

Let's take a contemporary example of the dispute about justice.

But that feeling of puzzlement is structural to contemporary art.

We had to solve the chemistry for making large DNA molecules, and we had to solve the biological side of how, if we had this new chemical entity, how would we boot it up, activate it in a recipient cell.

An answer is that every one of these is a potential problem for passive reinforcement learning.

In private.