That's inductive reasoning.

D, inferring a general truth by examining a number of specific examples.

But if you see a couple of examples and you see a pattern there you can often extrapolate and get to a kind of broader generalization.

So anyway, you have some statements and you deduce other statements that must be true given those.

That is deductive reasoning.

Francis Bacon and then, later, Isaac Newton, had proposed an inductive scientific method.

Well, I don't want to get too complicated here, because this is a question on deductive reasoning.

Our base case is T(1) 1, which is indeed less than or equal to 4.

less than or equal to n 1 2T(n 2) 1 2T(n) just like we argued before.

So Bill must be tall.

How?

He wins his arguments by logical reasoning.

Let me give you an algorithm that defines value iteration.

Because I have no arm!

But that's not what they're asking us about this.

Now this is a little bit of a mathematical abuse of induction.

We're going to explore in the days and weeks to come the contrast between consequentialist and categorical moral principles.

Well, I do think there's a good framework for thinking.

C, defining mathematical terms to correspond with physical objects.

That's our base case.

We're born problem solvers.

The same is true over here.

You want my guess?

A whodunit.

Awesome and airtight.

And then we can see which of these definitions matches it.

My husband ran for a reason, and I'm sure it was a damn good one.

If there's 1 node, we just return that node.

Y is either zero or one, but if you are using

If you won't see my line of reasoning, it's war between us.

Brilliant deduction, sherlock.

And then we reason backwards from what we observe to what could have happened beforehand.

Eventually, I was able to deduce most of their huge logical alphabet.

You're wide of the mark.

Your guess is wrong.

Hi what's new?

Hi. What's new?

You guessed right.

You guessed right.

He reads detective stories on occasion.

Probably a .22 or .25.

And then if we know it's true for this, we know it's going to be true for the next increment.

Christi's mysteries are most decidedly interesting.

Sure. It's called Charlie Chan in London . lt's a detective story.

I have been able to deduce this much.