The data to be discussed below was collected in the following way.

This is what I want to share with you today.

It's how they start arguments with people they've just met.

Think of all the roles that people play in arguments.

I don't think now's the time to be parsing which laws we'll be obeying and which we will not.

I thought I had better change.

I don't want to worry them. You okay?

Let's take advantage of the 'exemption' controversy to reconsider the way we work.

A discussion of the proposal seems to be in order.

who have indicated that file sharing could be positive for the industry that have been hunted down with a whip.

Let's not argue for the sake of arguing.

The bill was passed after a hard fight in the House.

So, we talked about ways in which perhaps one could partner to be able to bring the cost of this technology down.

listen to at least three radio stations a day.

All the arguments pointed in the same direction.

I took his side in the argument.

You could get fairly sophisticated with your mathematics.

There was much argument against the bill.

I had him in that discussion.

I'm a professor, I get paid to have fanciful theories.

You've got this beautiful paradigm.

You can't help but think that.

You're such a debater, M. Pierre.

Define controversial.

That's the kind of argument we want.

Objection.Argumentative.

I've heard that argument before.

It magnifies the us versus them aspect of it.

There was a lot of gunfire, there were a lot of philosophical discussions he had with the gang members.

So, how can we find ways to make arguments yield something positive?

But again, coal.

Can you imagine yourself watching yourself argue,

So the total permutations here or the total number of possibilities, or the total number of ways, to pick

There was much argument for and against the bill.

Well, there are some other puzzles.

Let's carry on the discussion.

Let's be done with the argument.

Let's end this debate.

This magenta distance minus this light blue distance.

And the tools are highly inaudible so unlike that, that statement that was done before.

For the sake of argument, let's say that

We were the best that they could do.

He wins his arguments by logical reasoning.

What we need is new exit strategies for arguments.

Is intellectual property a fair system?