That's what satisfies our initial condition.

And everything greater than 1 will satisfy this equation.

So either (you can write it this way) positive or negative 1 and then negative or positive 18 to show that they have to be different signs.

So something that meets both of these constraints will satisfy the equation.

This Gaussian constraint over here characterizes the constraint between x1 and x0 and wishes them to be exactly 10 apart.

German speaking states.

When x is 0 here, 0 plus 3 is equal to 3.

You get x could also be equal to positive 5 2.

And then we want to find the x intercepts, we replace y with 0. And come up with a quadratic equation.

Any x that is less than or equal to 3 will satisfy this equation.

And you could try out any value less than 1 10 and verify that it will satisfy this inequality.

Last month I officially divorced my wife.

In 1908, the austro hungarian empire formally annexes

Mr. McPherson, we are duly appointed federal marshals.

The entered address does not have the required form.

6 weeks later

And we are done.

This is 9 minus 6, which is indeed 3.

So two is greater than one.

And we exclude negative 2 by drawing an open circle at negative 2, but all the values greater than that are valid x's that would solve, that would satisfy this inequality.

I'm official.

So even with our hand drawn graph, we were able to inspect it and see that, yes, we were able to come up with the point 3 comma 3, and that does satisfy both of these equations.

Precision is less than 1.0, fixed

What did you gain, cognitively, from convincing me?

And I'd try out any x that's less than or equal to 3 and verify for yourself that it does indeed satisfy this inequality.

So now that we divided both sides by a negative number, by negative 3, we swapped the inequality from greater than to less than.

Two should work for that.

10 11, no It is not true.

The moment the lights go down is often the best part, you know?

leap of faith, that this is the only general solution.

Sam got a raw deal when he was laid off just before his job would have become permanent.

So we have 1 2x7 13 ?I put a ? because we don't know if it satisfies.

Now, what if I were to ask you, is there an x and y pair that satisfies both of these equations?

So that equal part of the greater than or equal saves us.

She has legally divorced her husband.

So the explicit form that satisfies our initial condition, and we're getting a little geeky here, you could get rid of the plus, it's 1 minus this whole thing.

So this would satisfy this equation, but it would not satisfy this equation.

The military gave an official notice to the local government.

You have to be in this range.

So we verified that for this function, for y1 is equal to e to the minus 3x, it satisfies this differential equation.

But now you'd be going after us For embracing the bedrock of family values.

And everything larger than that is a valid y, is a y that will satisfy the inequality.

A year and a half after I moved to Toronto,

Footage just released, showing the former vice president in an undisclosed location taking the oath of office and assuming his position as the next U. S. president.

6 would satisfy it, 10 would satisfy it, 100 would satisfy it.