This is not the very distant future.

JOLANKA NlCKERMAN Methane is actually a very potent greenhouse gas.

Go to ClimateCrisis.org or CarbonCalculator.com and buy carbon credits.

So an 82 percent absolute reduction translates into a 90 percent reduction in greenhouse gas intensity relative to sales.

So I can tell you how far we have come in the ensuing 12 years.

Surprisingly, agriculture is the biggest contributor to climate change.

Here's a little question.

And so I get to think of places that have nothing to do with Google's core business, but where we can really have a big impact in reducing greenhouse gas emissions.

And I mean that with all seriousness.

In my particular job, I'm trying to have the biggest impact in terms of reductions of greenhouse gases.

But they're also materials with very high energy and very high greenhouse gas emissions in their process.

Because California was the first state in this country to mandate 25 percent reduction of greenhouse gases by 2020.

In doing so, we'll be removing a large part of our greatest carbon sink and replacing it with the most high greenhouse gas emission oil in the future.

The choice here, to put a gas systematic ? in and collect ? and manage the landfill gas, was predicated on the fact that we could manage the carbon offsets, reduce our carbon footprint, and market carbon credits to the value which would assist in offsetting most of our cost.

So what we're doing is, we're taking the most concentrated greenhouse gas sink, twice as much greenhouse gases are sequestered in the boreal per acre than the tropical rainforests.

Well not in our state!

And this is the object of their scrutiny.

The first way, which is the most important way, is through reducing the emissions from our own operations.

A greenhouse effect. Everything is burning up.

If Greens globally found some reason to re assess nuclear, but we only have a limited amount of money.

Why do we need to study this anymore?

This is a U.S. statistic about the impact of greenhouse gases.

CO2e emissions are equivalent emissions of all the greenhouse gases and particles that cause warming and converted to CO2.

And that is now what we're trying to do, and working with this large cities group to fight climate change, to negotiate huge, big, volume deals that will enable cities which generate 75 percent of the world's greenhouse gases, to drastically and quickly reduce greenhouse gas emissions in a way that is good economics.

So it's a bit counterintuitive, but by collecting methane and burning it, which converts it into carbon dioxide, you're actually dramatically reducing the greenhouse gas emissions from the landfill.

The second pressure on the planet is, of course the climate agenda the big issue where the policy interpretation of science is that it would be enough to stabilize greenhouse gases at 450 ppm to avoid average temperatures exceeding two degrees, to avoid the risk that we may be destabilizing the West Antarctic Ice Sheet, holding six meters level rising, the risk of destabilizing the Greenland Ice Sheet, holding another seven meters sea level rising.

Furthermore, per kilogram of manure, you have much, much less ammonia and fewer greenhouse gases when you have insect manure than when you have cow manure.

If so, more warming is in the pipeline.

We stopped irrigating our soil, as much as we could.

Steel represents about three percent of man's greenhouse gas emissions, and concrete is over five percent.

Its changes will affect all of humanity.

So this technology, 3D printing, and new design rules really help us to reduce the weight, which is the biggest issue in aircraft design, because it's directly linked to greenhouse gas emissions.

You want to reduce green house gases.

Delete page effect

Box Snakes

Two Box Left Out

Waterfall

Parallel Snakes

Diagonal Top Left Opposite In

Clockwise Top Left In

Clockwise Top Left Out

Clockwise Top Right In

Clockwise Bottom Left In

Clockwise Bottom Left Out

Counterclockwise Top Left In