Is that scientifically proven?

Has that been scientifically proven?

I don't know

sciencey?

security is showing a breakin at the r d department.

Decisions must not represent personal opinions, but an action as result of scientific research.

Would I be willing to provide a scientific endorsement of a mood boosting bottled water?

Wow, wow!

like, Okay, what I want to do with my life is change the world.

And this is, obviously, not less than 10.

We investigate claims of the paranormal, pseudo science, fringe groups and cults, and claims of all kinds between, science and pseudo science and non science and junk science, voodoo science, pathological science, bad science, non science, and plain old non sense.

Well, from the standpoint of science...

We've had science proving the urgency of change.

Now, are we done? Have we written what we have here in scientific notation?

let's remember what it means to be in scientific notation.

Something Something scientific, right. What?

In our class we teach you what it take to develop software to verify hardware.

What this means is for every likely origin, you go and conduct an experiment to see whether it actually is the cause of the failure.

The scientist maintained that the theory should be tested through experiments.

But this is not quite official scientific notation.

Nye Now, um, space walks, launching Japanese modules, making scientific discoveries, that's routine.

This isn't very scientific.

His specialty was actually refining and confirming other people's results, and this might sound like a bit of an also ran, but in fact, this is the soul of science, because there is no such thing as a fact that cannot be independently corroborated.

You know, scientists and science is not creative.

A connection between personality and blood type has not been scientifically proven.

Now, once you do that, it turns out there are three factors that the science shows lead to better performance.

So that's the personal reason.

Observation is a passive science, experimentation an active science.

Why do apples fall down?

And the goal of the program is to

This is scientific evidence from wellknown researchers forced to work in secret.

The weather is forecast scientifically.

But after that,

And I think the implications here are profound, whether it's for science, for commerce, for government, or perhaps most of all, for us as individuals.

Validation

Verify...

Verify

But of course, the drama is, it clearly shows that incremental change is not an option.

So what we've been doing in the United States is reviewing the data endlessly reviewing the data.

The Vulcan Science Academy was just as skeptical about time travel.

But the trouble with the philosophers is that they were philosophizing when they should have been science ophizing.

And that implies testability, the scientific method, the Enlightenment, and everything.

And it's not a theory, as some proponents of it put it, and they kind of surround it with scientific sounding terms, but it's not a theory.

That's the humanitarian mission.

Here's a redletter date in the history of science.