Is that scientifically proven?

Has that been scientifically proven?

Observation is a passive science, experimentation an active science.

sciencey?

Why did we use that word, science?

This is the truth, about death, the truth discovered by science, until now.

And here's the problem.

We investigate claims of the paranormal, pseudo science, fringe groups and cults, and claims of all kinds between, science and pseudo science and non science and junk science, voodoo science, pathological science, bad science, non science, and plain old non sense.

Imagine juggling a snowball across the tropics.

Now, are we done? Have we written what we have here in scientific notation?

let's remember what it means to be in scientific notation.

Something Something scientific, right. What?

Would I be willing to provide a scientific endorsement of a mood boosting bottled water?

Wow, wow!

But it's not gone.

But this is not quite official scientific notation.

Nye Now, um, space walks, launching Japanese modules, making scientific discoveries, that's routine.

This isn't very scientific.

You know, scientists and science is not creative.

And this is, obviously, not less than 10.

So let's multiply first, and then let's get what we have into scientific notation.

This sounds like a science project.

Why do apples fall down?

And the goal of the program is to

Well, from the standpoint of science...

We've had science proving the urgency of change.

This is scientific evidence from wellknown researchers forced to work in secret.

The scientific truth of evolution is so overwhelmingly established, that it is virtually impossible to refute.

In other words, race has no basis in biological or scientific fact.

A connection between personality and blood type has not been scientifically proven.

Now, once you do that, it turns out there are three factors that the science shows lead to better performance.

It's actually a big name for little thing but this little thing again has big consequences.

That's the humanitarian mission.

Here's a redletter date in the history of science.

What?

I don't know

It's 27 kilometers in circumference.

From a strictly scientific point of view, history cannot be called a science.

It also shaped Darwin's scientific method, as well as that used by his peers.

Analyze and plot scientific data

A structured wysiwyg scientific text editor

And we still have this 4.01534 times 10 to the negative 8.

That's what gets us to that eight.

So that's the personal reason.

(Applause)