We studied the government's economic policy.

The government is reluctant to alter its economic policy.

Why?

The government's economic policy is credited for Japan's postwar economic success.

In other words at some point when we've recovered we go up to the peak.

Although the government refuses to admit it, its economic policy is in ruins.

The fiscal austerity may lead to an overkill of the economy.

We need something different.

A stable economy is the aim of every government.

At least not on the economics of politics.

Tax cuts are often used as a major fiscal tool to stimulate the economy.

That can't keep going on, because economic incentives and disincentives are very powerful.

Our highest institution in our country was perverted.

And they see a 20 bill.

This is an Oxford trained economist steeped in humanistic values, and yet he agrees with the high pressure tactics of Shanghai.

And the company contributed about 190 million dollars to the government coffers.

Japan's changing economic policy is tied up with the labor shortage.

With more support, this transformation can be even better and deeper.

Private firms, however large they are, like Lenovo, depend in many ways on state patronage.

System D for the economy of self reliance, or the DlY economy.

One is it's got to do economic reform, not fuss about the political constitution.

Euvin was talking about bellwether signs.

Presidential candidate Obama's economics team seems to be made up of distinguished neoliberals.

Begin rerouting the targets.

The economy is deeply connected to politics.

On the other side, as I said, there are those who say the problem is that we need more money.

When disaster strikes the economy gets blown, people lose a job, floods, war, conflict, bad governance, all of those things there is nothing to fall back on.

And there are two key things it's got to do.

Because, any future planning, if 2048 is when we want to get there, unless the arts are put with the scientists, with the economists, with all those who prepare for the future, badly, we're not going to get there.

Now that begins with economic power, but that's the way it always begins.

The question is What do we believe?

This perhaps is less interesting, but we're trying to get the governments to all work together and it's not easy.

Political, economic, social, even tourist stuff.

This is one of the factors which needs to be resolved.

The Solidarity Economy multiplies its influence by way of workers' national organisations both in the countryside and at cities,

Microeconomics .. and those actors could be firms, could be people, it could be households.

Now, of course our situation in the world can be understood at many levels from the level of the genome on up to the level of economic systems and political arrangements.

What I would like to see is idealism decoupled from all constraints.

For the Christ, the temptations are economic, political and spiritual.

And housing prices continue to fall even as the latest economic stimulus package fights its way through...

Governments snatch short term opportunities and, by the end of the conflict, the chickens have come home to roost.

Today, he sat down with our Margaret Warner in Mexico City to discuss his plans to re focus the drug war and reform the Mexican Economy.

Now we're running a stimulus package.

And for the North Korean government, this was a serious miscalculation, on their part, but they were also awakened to the realization of how integral the markets had become, not only to the economy, but to the North Korean people.

Few governments can manage the economy successfully.