Goodness is abstract, a kind act is concrete.

You know, a lot of people risk their lives in a brief act of heroism, which is kind of cool, but Jill has what I call slow heroism.

Keeps the riffraff out.

Suicide is a desperate act.

Do you file that under deception or hypocrisy?

She said never. It's unrcontionable.

Now, in this version, there are no sensors and so no percepts.

It would be a rare, unselfish act.

Applause

What could be the aim of this despicable act?

No action is in itself good or bad.

Who told you to kill me?

No physical abuse? No criminal behavior?

Practical wisdom is the moral will to do the right thing and the moral skill to figure out what the right thing is.

Every sane man is accountable to his conscience for his behavior.

Take counsel with a man who is wise and of a good conscience.

Absolutely, I said.

That is, we can follow our best policy some percentage of the time, and then randomly, at some point, we can decide to take an action which is not the optimal action.

Everybody praised his heroism.

Is that it? Of course, I'm saying fight.

We can compute a better value.

Manmade breaches.

I couldn't bear it.

Did you notice anything strange before she made the attempt?

Nothing out of the ordinary?

I wish you hadn't done that.

A conscience!

Conscience!

Your unparalleled genius act is wearing thin.

Her kind action strongly impressed me.

It's really different from planning than before because of the stochasticity of the action effects.

The Asch conformity experiment has been repeated many times. It's been suggested that first, the distortion happens at the level of action.

That stands for standard error, we'll get there next week. Okay. So let's talk about first, measures of central tendency.

You want to risk your own life over a fit of conscience, that's fine.

And if they said yes, we gave them the one that they built and we broke.

I appreciate it more.

Ahsoka, it's too risky.

We have a deterministic environment, which means the state transitions are deterministic.

look like the first moral principle that emerged from the discussion said that the right thing to do the moral thing to do depends on the consequences that will result from your action at the end of the day better that five should live even if one must die.

I told you my reasons for objecting.

Would you like to be Pinocchio's conscience?

One unifying detail seems to be that the attackers in many instances, appear to be... dead excited to have with us here, a sensational charttopping... or ideological connection between those committing the atrocities, and perhaps, more alarmingly...

Dog in trouble, and the father wants do a good deed.

Unfortunately, they, like us, have a dark side to their nature.

General improvements