There is a logical explanation.

NARRATOR Tomorrow the Westborne Clarion will have a new editor.

There's a logical explanation for this.

There's a perfectly logical explanation for all this.

There's nothing to test.

And what we did, over the last few months well, a few months ago,

Alright, so let's look at one of the illusions here.

The argument has no force.

His paper reads like a novel.

And you give me your reasons.

Here's persuasion... and here's reason.

So that means that this path, p, must be the minimal cost path.

And it sort of worked, but it didn't work very well.

This scientific article reads like a novel.

The irreligious scoffed at the bishop's interpretation.

His argument was most convincing.

It's this non zero sumness stuff you just heard a little bit about.

Now, for the answers. A theory is the outcome of the scientific method.

(Laughter)

It's the beginning of the causal chain for science.

He illustrated his theory with examples.

He illustrated the theory with facts.

The teacher illustrated his theory with pictures.

The teacher explained his theory using pictures.

So, I want you to just think about it for a moment.

Charles Darwin also wrote the facial feedback response theory.

The speaker illustrated the theory with examples.

This is Niles Eldredge. He was the co developer with Stephen Jay Gould of the theory of punctuated equilibrium.

Do you have any theories as to what caused this?

Now I want to talk about approximate inference by means of sampling.

He is a critic rather than a novelist.

We could not resist the force of his logic.

The causes of x are outside of our model.

Let's just say, just for the sake of argument, that it was a comeon.

You see... And if he gives me trouble, I always have persuasion and reason.

One very common reaction I've heard about 20 times is, But it was investigated.

Is that what happened?

Aristotle wrote the single most important work on persuasion, lt i gt Rhetoric lt i gt , the 3 means of persuasion

Now, just one more thing.

There's really no other logical explanation for it. I was...

And it's only when an explanation is good that it even matters whether it's testable.

So, this is exactly what you want in physics where a prediction comes out of a mathematically consistent theory that was actually developed for something else.

The result confirmed my hypothesis.

His speech was an effective apology for the Government's policies.

One is well known untestable theories.