And each time I make public art,

Emotions run deep within our race.

Spatial reasoning is deeply connected to how we understand a lot of the world around us.

Now I know no one here at TED thinks this.

Thank God there's been nothing between us!

Everyone has relationships with other people, and they're interested in these relationships for a variety of reasons.

You obtain a backward slice by starting with a statement S, and then following all the dependencies until you have reached a fixed point.

The economy is deeply connected to politics.

Whether it's the abode of a spirit or a pile of ore is irrelevant.

What about causality?

You could have friendship relationships, sibling relationships, spousal relationships, co worker relationships, neighbor relationships and the like.

You are deeply involved with this.

The answer is yes clearly for different values of A, I get different values of B.

If it has something to do with Kimble, I'm interested.

So, lets imagine there is some problem called graph partitioning which is a real problem.

To determine your relationship to the child.

Are academics like us being coerced or incentivized or are we just curious to see what happens?

So from not even knowing the meaning, you're beginning to construct some characterization of the relationship between Hamlet and Polonius, which was not good.

Politics has much to do with me.

Now this problem 5 here let me scroll over a little bit they say determine whether each relation is a function.

And there are different kinds of relationships between the people.

Those kinds of loose analogies with (Laughter) computers, and with programming, are actually much deeper than that.

Now on top of that, the slovenian language is also Slavic it's closely related to Serbo Croation.

If you have manageable health problems it doesn't really matter.

Does Twitter come into this, does Wikileaks come into this?

We all want it most settle for connection, love's too scary.

But there is zero correlation between IQ and emotional empathy, feeling with the other person.

And how they can tell us a lot about what's going on in our data.

This time we're not going to paint blue paint on their forehead.

It is nothing to me.

That has nothing to do with me.

I have nothing to do with that.

In MCMC, that's not true.

Throughout this whole thing, making toys,

She sleep with vampires too?

I probably learned the most about relationships.

This is bullshit, come on.

You might ask what first order means.

That alone suggests that there is some sort of common formative mechanism.

Relationship

Involved?

What about the second assumption?

You don't know where I am or what I'm doing or who I'm with.

And then the idea of confounds. And the most important concept to take away from this segment is the idea of causality.

Vaziri's help.