0.75 0.42 is much smaller than 0.5. Obviously, it's a small sample.

Now let's go in the other direction and take a small sample.

I mean, this is a very small sample you should not generalize from it.

Just taking a small sample of data. I, took all the information from the New

That is just a small sample of all of the people we know at MlT.

So now, we're experiencing a lot of sampling error because our sample is so small.

We're not killing the colony we're taking a small core sample out of the top.

So just by getting a large sample you can get small effects to be significant.

There's always a little fluctuation from sample to sample.

I've surveyed a sample.

Sample

This is a positive sample.

This is a sample SRT.

So here's a sample one.

Let's get a random sample.

I got a hair sample.

Now I should argue this 1.96 trick isn't mathematically correct for very small sample sizes.

If I took small samples of ten, then the distribution of sample means, would be Y. There could be lot of fluctuation, so it'd have a wide distribution of sample means.

Always sample

Maximum sample

Sample rate

Sample Rate

Sample rate

Sample Size

Sample rate

Sample Width

Sample radius

Sample merged

He wrote away for a sample.

Could I have a sample taste?

So we have a big sample.

A very large sample is needed.

And I'm going to show you a small sample of this, but there's really a theoretical reason why technology develops in an exponential fashion.

DNA is extracted from a blood sample.

I'll ask you for a mouse sample.

The correlation coefficient is a sample statistic.

It's a pleasure I yearn to sample!

JS Sample Engine

Javascript Sample Engine

Fourteen Segment Sample

Individual Digit Sample

Sample Tag 1

Sample Tag 2

Sample Tag 3

Sample standard deviation