It's a kind of portfolio move you make to be more dogmatic elsewhere, right?

We can either go on bringing out or emphasizing the dogmatic and intolerant aspects of our faith, or we can go back to the rabbis.

Sometimes, the most intellectually trustworthy people are the ones who pick one area, and they are totally dogmatic in that, so pig headedly unreasonable, that you think, How can they possibly believe that?

Emanuel Kant described very well the problem with skepticism when he wrote skepticism is a resting place for human reason where it can reflect upon its dogmatic wanderings but it is no dwelling place for permanent settlement.