Given that the null hypothesis is true.

It's not the probability that the Null hypothesis, of the Null hypothesis being true.

A new hypothesis is the error is due to the quote condition evaluating to true.

Is, before we, conduct an experiment or do a study we, assume that the null hypothesis is true.

But this is hypothesis generating.

And so our hypothesis is

If my hypothesis is correct,

I made a hypothesis, a ridiculous hypothesis.

That this Null Hypothesis is not a very competitive hypothesis sort of speed.

This is just a hypothesis but

Then, in the 1960s, Paul J. Cohen showed that you can never prove that the continuum hypothesis is true.

Given, that's that vertical bar, you can read that as given The assumption that the null hypothesis is true.

Our hypothesis is based on thorough experiments.

Last hypothesis is it the problem domain?

Next hypothesis tests.

Next hypothesis complexity.

It's a hypothesis,

Look for the cancer hypothesis and the not cancer hypothesis.

If this is our hypothesis, we now must devise an experiment to further refine this hypothesis.

And our null hypothesis is equals p 0.9 and our alternate hypothesis, if it doesn't work, as well as the null hypothesis, so p is smaller than 0.9.

The hypothesis is based on the thorough experiments.

My hypothesis is, American soldiers are good, usually.

There is a bit of a hypothesis though.

Conversely, if the null hypothesis falls outside, you don't believe null hypothesis and you accept the alternate hypothesis.

A theory is also particularly useful hypothesis because we refined the hypothesis until it becomes a theory.

That's true. That is definitely true.

True or True is also True , but False or False is False

So the physics is that you cannot prove a hypothesis, but it's easy to disprove it any hypothesis is shaky.

I favored the hypothesis.

I favored the hypothesis.

So that's the hypothesis.

AG Okay, hypothesis two.

If the null hypothesis is inside the confidence interval of the observed sample, everything is okay and you believe null hypothesis.

That's not true. No, it is true.

I would say your counter hypothesis the alternate hypothesis is p is smaller than 0.09, and the reason why is I said the counter hypothesis if the medication doesn't work as well as advertised.

If the observation, however, is not in line with your prediction, then the hypothesis is rejected, and if the hypothesis is rejected, you need to come up with a new hypothesis, and this cycle going along from hypothesis through prediction through experiment through observation and gradually refining the hypothesis or coming up with alternatives.

Is that true?

Is that true?

This is true.

Is that true?

Is it true?

This is true.

Is this true?

Value is true

Pink is True,