I develop and test models of the Big Bang, using observational data.

Observational studies. Are als, also useful.

The problem is that these observational studies.

And. In, within these observational studies a

Here, I'm mostly just assuming still observational studies.

Here again are some of the observational results.

I want to contrast that now. With, observational studies.

That means I'm making a distinction between an observational.

Differentialists tend to rely on observational studies and correlations.

So again, the point of talking about these observational studies.

Data, data, data...

Bing! That's data. Data, data, data.

Observational cosmology really started blossoming from 1970's onward. And thanks

So that's why these observational studies aren't as powerful as randomized experiments.

And that's one of the limitations of these kinds of observational studies.

In the second, I'll give you a couple examples of observational studies.

We have two pieces of observational evidence on the probability of life appearing.

Say sorted data is data.

little data, old data, no data. So back in 1995,

Data

Data...

Data

Data

Data

Data

like DNA data or brain data.

Raw data now! Raw data now!

But the way incongruity works is, observational humor is humor within the realm of reality.

We have 2 independent hidden causes, but they get confounded within a single observational variable.

So you go and find the paper, and what you find is an observational study.

looking at wind data and solar data.

Data Viewer

(binary data)

raw data

? target data?

Merge data

Data Mode

Data mode

Data size

Data encoding

Data Section

Data Project

Text Data

Data DVD

Data CD