Describe semantics here...

it's not semantics.

It's got a semantics.

Unless noted otherwise, the semantics of the functions are identical.

Always keep the same semantics.

We often call that Meaning or Semantics.

And the semantics are the i jth entry of the matrix is 1.

The syntax and semantics of the regular expressions sup ported by PCRE are described below.

But the semantics, the meaning is largely the same.

Why not? Depends on the rest of the application semantics.

Semantics of a program its meaning, what does it compute.

So we've just finished learning about interpreters and formal semantics.

I can't know unless I know more about the application semantics.

We'll pretty much always have the same semantics for T(n).

Types are our first step along the road to meaning, and in computer science we formally call that semantics.

And for these more bottom up segmentation approaches, we need them to include semantics.

Please refer to the UML documentation for the detailed information about UML semantics and notation.

You have to respect the formal semantics or at least, that's what I've always told you.

Once we have a grip on semantics, we can introduce optimization, where we replace one program with another or, conceptually, one part of a program with another as long as the whole thing has the same semantics.

We might replace the subtrees like x 1 with just x if we believed that that preserve semantics.

Then the behavior of the program is undefined according to the semantics of C and also C does follow.

But I didn't want to argue semantics with these boys, so after a very long, uncomfortable pause, I said,

The fact that assertions can be turned off and frequently will also implies that that assertions must not change the program semantics.

One aspect of program semantics or program meanings is the notion of types that we can classify objects or values like 1, 2, and 3 into groups and say, Those are all numbers.

In addition, PHP' s developers have tried to clean up both PHP's syntax and semantics in version 3.0, and this has also caused some incompatibilities.

This way if the assertion is turned off has no effect then the semantics of the program will still be unchanged except that the checks will be gone.

So in this class we're going to talk about how to construct this Bayes network, what the semantics are, and how to reason in this Bayes network to find out about variables we can't observe, like whether the fan belt is broken or not.

A declarative representation that is stand alone, where you could look at a probability distribution, and it has clear semantics, that represent our uncertainty about different states that the world might be in.

By the way, if you've been wondering the whole time, semantics is a tricky word that essentially always ends in an S, even when we're using it in sort of a singular fashion.

Remember that we can only apply an optimization that is, we can only replace one subtree of a program with another if we don't change the semantics, the meaning, the answer of the program.

They are ideals that are powerful. They are irreducible. They are unique.

Nerves are yellow, arteries are red, veins are blue.

Some are poor, some are wealthy. There are billions.

There are. There always are.

Are you ? Are you there?

They are what they are.

You are, Billy, you are.

We are, sweetheart, we are.

No. You are. You are.

We are who we are.

Some are lost, some are damaged, some are losing power.

Are.

...are...

Some are moderate some are radical.

We are glad you are coming.