He just couldn't capture the picture. And so they were talking back and forth about this question.

And let me explain what I mean.

And back even two or three years ago, when people used to make this argument.

It is useless even if I discuss with you.

Unless there's a problem you'd like to discuss.

The debate went back and forth, and on into the night.

I don't understand what you're saying.

And finally this is really the worst thing arguments don't seem to get us anywhere they're dead ends.

They got along famously until the very end of the meal, and then they got into a furious argument.

From the tone,it sounded like you were having an argument.

I get emails still from teachers in countries I've never visited saying, Wow, yeah.

I think you've imagined a good arguer, an arguer that's worthy of the kind of arguer you should try to be.

Every article on Wikipedia has a corresponding discussion page, and on the discussion page they had extensive argument among the Wikipedians as to whether to have his real name featured in the article.

Don't ever argue with the Devil.

They can indict your ass. They can debate it.

The discussion was heated.

They argued outside the Pig 'n Whistle.

Once you go on that vacation, there's nothing left over.

Getting the creative juices flowing on this continent, much of what you have seen here.

I'm just here for 80 years and then that's it.

Which shall survive?

So we have these models argument as war, argument as proof and argument as performance.

Don't even start. I don't wanna discuss this.

I will discuss the question with you in detail.

At the meeting he monopolized the discussion and completely disrupted the proceeding.

They grew warm over the debate.

But with Africa, let's start being careful about this.

Because of the oil, everybody talked about the polilution.

I had him in that discussion.

And I actually went to the Marginal Revolution blog by Tyler Cowen.

Through a comment I made in class on Facebook a discussion erupted in our

Discuss.

I remember you and my father having similar discussions.

I won't argue with that.

A concrete plan evolved after much discussion.

I looked up Hubert Dreyfus, who's a world renowned professor of philosophy,

Is this a viable interpretation of the data or the text?

I think the economics are pretty clear on this.

When this result was first published, it was highly controversial.

It's got a semantics.

I wish to discuss something with you.

After three hours of discussion we got nowhere.

The discussion produced a great deal of noise, but no forward motion.

We've known about this problem for 50 years, depending on how you count it.

And this was debated in Congress for ages and ages.