Should only take a few minutes.

So we divide the 5 into the 6, figure out how many times it goes.

Here we're steering at the first turn, here we're on the straightaway.

It is not a whole number it is not an integer.is it a rational number sure it is as 1 and 3 are integers. so 1 3 is a rational number.if something is rational it cannot be irrational and it is also a real number

But your numerator is going to be your numerator of the fraction part before.

Is there a service charge for that?

So far I've assumed it's simply constant and you know it.

I do, Father.

And so this is equal to we still have a whole number part six but the fraction part is now one, one over four, so we get six and one fourth.

So if I wanted to convert two and one half into an improper fraction, or I want to unmix it you could say, all I do is I take the denominator in the fraction part, multiply it by the whole number, and add the numerator.

And the easiest one I can think of is multiply both sides by 3.

So just the process when you add fractions is if they already well, first of all, if they're not mixed numbers, and neither of these are, and if they have the same denominator.

Once again, we can literally just

They say you come to Vietnam and understand a lot in a few minutes.

Usually a few seconds, but with the backward way they have the system set up, it's gonna take at least a few minutes.

Is P contained within or possibly equal to NP?

Or x is equal to 5 could be y is equal to 8.

3 times 25, 25 is 5 times 5.

This right here is just 3 times 2, So we get x to the 6th power.

And if you're not sure about this, because sometimes it is confusing with the fractions and whatever else, take the derivative.

Which is clearly smaller than 2 and 1 2.

And the, the neck or chest radiant is more light. And the albedo captures that.

If I have a negative divided by a negative, that's going to give me a positive, and if obviously a positive divided by a positive, that's also going to give me a positive.

So if you have 5 and 1 over 4, to convert it into an improper fraction, you're going to keep the same denominator, so you're going to have the over 4 there.

So this is the same thing as six plus four over sixteen, which is the same thing as writing is a mixed number six and four sixteenths.

No, it is too dangerous I do not want to, understood?

The Fibonacci sequence is strictly nondecreasing.

So let's say that it equals 1 over 2 tau, and you'll see why

In this situation right here we have a mixed number where 5 is the whole number and 1 4 is a proper fraction as numerator is less than denominator

Let me show you a simulation of what a pandemic looks like.

So we're actually going up by increasing amounts, so we're definitely dealing with a non linear function.

You could do it to your own kid. It changes color.

This seems a little weird when we say it verbally, but if you look at it, it's more or less just what we expect.

The time needed to perform the calculations increases rapidly as there are more steps involved.

And that's what allowed the gunman in Aurora to shoot 70 people, 70 people, killing 12.

So if you know the number of protons in an element, you know what that element is.

So the chance that she's innocent isn't one in 73 million.

So these two ways the easiest way to convert a mixed number into a decimal is to just say, OK, this is 1 and then some fraction that's less than 1.

So we just have to figure out the real and the imaginary parts.

The star will refer back to the space, and we can have 0 or more of these.

So let me write that down and I want to color code it.

Is there a handling charge?

light to dark in six seconds exactly that.

Well, 12 is divisible by 12, and 12 is also divisible by 2, so 12 is the least common multiple.

But let's just assume that there's some third root, we don't know what it looks like.