If I can reset June's presentation to about 3 or 4 slides ago.

And then what's the derivative of y squared with respect to x?

The audio level must not exceed 80 db.

Because it is a little bit of a game.

Well what's this term going to do?

What we're going to imagine now is that someone has given us matrix.

Actually, let me write that down explicitly.

And of course, then we subtract an 8 so this guy disappears.

But maybe y is equal to e to some constant r, times x.

Now imagine if I tell you, all those who are standing,

We assumed that s is greater than 0 this example.

The Laplace transform of 1 we just did it at beginning of the video was equal to 1 s, if we assume that s is greater than zero.

This is our original y.

Uh oh, we loop forever.

We hypothesized that these waves Could be used to communicate information.

Again, what do you think could help us get the right answer this time?

Our profit in the first period is 30,000.

So I'd have to write negative, we're assuming this is going out,

You send it by network from one computer center to another.

You have a sales force and you're selling directly to the end consumer.

We're assuming that the coin can't land on its edge and remain standing straight up.

Kathleen's idea,

Don't torture yourself with hypotheticals.

Let us suppose that the news is true.

Because we'll see later in this video that to some degree, that assumption is one of the biggest drivers of assumption.

So let's apply this cocky attitude to the problem of multiplying two integers.

Let's pick a different base.

So he wasn't drunk...

Let's say at minus 20 the height is very low.

We could have arrived here in 3 different ways.

Who, tried to give the first solution to the shape from shading problem.

So, what's the proof?

But one thing that's happened, a lot of people said, oh, Sal, you're making oversimplifying assumptions.

The year after that it's 35.

Also, timing can become an issue.

Take, for instance, what you carry, 9 mm hollowpoint.

When you're done with this, you arrive at a number that now combines the cancer hypothesis with the test result.

So, let's go back to that normal distribution.

I'll assume it's just a function of x.

We get in here, is halts (tsif) true?

We know from definition that 1 is equal to i times i. Everything seems pretty straightforward right now. And then they'll say,

And in the previous videos, the constants all merged together.

And we only care from zero to infinity, so I'll only do it from zero to infinity.

That was just a kind of a what if conversation.

But for the sake of simplicity ... ... we're going to assume ... ... that it was kind of a constant velocity ... ... or what we are calculating is going to be his average velocity.